Handbook of Footwear Design and Manufacture 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821606-4.00003-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Footwear for cold weather conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 8, it shows that the upper component of hot military combat boots has an average of 14.15 ± 0.52, 5.37 ± 2.01, 1.59 ± 0.62, and 0.87 ± 0.04 air permeability, water vapor permeability, thermal conductivity, and thermal resistance, respectively, whereas cold-weather military combat boots have a mean of 0.21 ± 0.08, 0.094 ± 0.02, 0.083 ± 0.03, and 9.61 ± 0.95 air permeability, water vapor permeability, thermal conductivity, and thermal resistance, respectively. Hot military combat boots have higher air permeability, water vapor permeability, and thermal conductivity with low thermal resistance, which indicates that they enable breathability, moisture-wicking, and airfow to prevent heatrelated injuries, evaporate quickly, and provide the necessary protection and support for soldiers to perform their duties efectively [4]. Cold-weather military combat boots show higher thermal resistance and low air permeability, water vapor permeability, and thermal conductivity; this reveals that they provide insulation and cold resistance to warmth to the feet of military personnel and protect against frostbite, hypothermia, and other cold-weather injuries while providing support and comfort for the feet during extended periods of use [28].…”
Section: Termal Comfort Property Of Military Combat Bootmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From Table 8, it shows that the upper component of hot military combat boots has an average of 14.15 ± 0.52, 5.37 ± 2.01, 1.59 ± 0.62, and 0.87 ± 0.04 air permeability, water vapor permeability, thermal conductivity, and thermal resistance, respectively, whereas cold-weather military combat boots have a mean of 0.21 ± 0.08, 0.094 ± 0.02, 0.083 ± 0.03, and 9.61 ± 0.95 air permeability, water vapor permeability, thermal conductivity, and thermal resistance, respectively. Hot military combat boots have higher air permeability, water vapor permeability, and thermal conductivity with low thermal resistance, which indicates that they enable breathability, moisture-wicking, and airfow to prevent heatrelated injuries, evaporate quickly, and provide the necessary protection and support for soldiers to perform their duties efectively [4]. Cold-weather military combat boots show higher thermal resistance and low air permeability, water vapor permeability, and thermal conductivity; this reveals that they provide insulation and cold resistance to warmth to the feet of military personnel and protect against frostbite, hypothermia, and other cold-weather injuries while providing support and comfort for the feet during extended periods of use [28].…”
Section: Termal Comfort Property Of Military Combat Bootmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Termal insulation indicates the material's ability to resist heat fow and is measured by thermal conductivity or insulation values. Low-conductivity materials better retain body heat in the shoe microclimate during cold exposure [4]. Moisture vapor permeability quantifes air and water vapor fow through the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Electrically heated footwear (EHF) was initially developed in 1964 (Goldman, 1964). However, the development was restricted due to the inadequate portability of heating devices (Kuklane and Kaced, 2021). Thanks to the miniaturization and lightweight nature of electric heating elements and power supplies, EHF has become more convenient for daily use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%