Foot-and-mouth disease vaccination: a multifactorial study of the influence of antigen dose and potentially competitive immunogens on the response of cattle of different ages

Black, L. M.; Nicholls, M; Rweyemamu, Mark M.; Ferrari, Roberto; Zunino, Marzia

doi:10.1016/s0034-5288(18)30539-3

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Commercial producers invariably go one stage further and adapt field strains to growth in tissue culture so as to optimize vaccine potency. Furthermore, there is no evidence of protective enhancement between virus strains included in conventional trivalent vaccines (3).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heterotypic protection induced by synthetic peptides corresponding to three serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Doel

Gale

Amaral

et al. 1990

J Virol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Synthetic peptide vaccines of the general sequence Cys-Cys(200-213)-Pro-Pro-Ser-(141-158)-Pro-Cys-Gly, where the numbered residues refer to VP1 sequences of three different strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus, have been evaluated in cattle and guinea pigs. High levels of serotype-specific (homotypic) antiviral and antipeptide antibody were produced with each peptide. The A-and 0-serotype peptides provided complete protection of guinea pigs against their respective virus challenges. The C-serotype peptide appeared to be less effective than the other peptides. In cross-protection studies (heterotypic) in guinea pigs, it was possible to protect A-serotype peptide-vaccinated animals against 0-virus challenge and vice versa. Some heterotypic protection was also achieved with the C-serotype peptide. The heterotypic protection observed related more to the presence of cross-reactive antipeptide antibody than to neutralizing antibody.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heterotypic protection induced by synthetic peptides corresponding to three serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Doel

Gale

Amaral

et al. 1990

J Virol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Through market mechanisms, SE can derive income from business activities and the traditional sources of NPO funding, such as donations and government subsidies (Bhattarai et al, 2019; Wilson & Post, 2013). Black et al (2014) suggested that SE, which may be self‐sufficient and market‐oriented, can uphold social justice and improve public welfare. Shepherd et al (2019) indicated that although the forms of SE differ, relevant leaders must consider both the financial and social goals of such enterprises.…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is brand reputation a banner for social marketing? A social enterprise product consumption perspective

Tsai

2023

Psychology and Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social enterprises (SEs) use various business models to pursue a balance between commercial profit and their social mission. This study uses quantitative and qualitative research methods to assess consumer purchasing decisions related to SEs and the impact of brand reputation on these decisions. Study 1 uses quantitative data to perform a multilevel analysis of consumer and corporate perspectives to examine the hypothesized relationships. We conduct study 2 to enable the robust generalization and further explanation of study 1's results by employing qualitative research. The results indicate that perceived contribution positively affects perceived behavioral control, while ethical self‐identity and product knowledge positively affect consumer attitudes. At the group level, brand reputation weakens the relationship between perceived contribution and perceived behavioral control; however, it strengthens the relationship between perceived risk and perceived behavioral control. These findings demonstrate that brand reputation is an important signal regarding SE products or services consumption and has significant implications for social marketing and brand strategy.

show abstract

Natural and Vaccine Induced Immunity to FMD

Tr¹

Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foot-and-mouth disease vaccination: a multifactorial study of the influence of antigen dose and potentially competitive immunogens on the response of cattle of different ages

Cited by 12 publications

References 14 publications

Heterotypic protection induced by synthetic peptides corresponding to three serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Heterotypic protection induced by synthetic peptides corresponding to three serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Is brand reputation a banner for social marketing? A social enterprise product consumption perspective

Natural and Vaccine Induced Immunity to FMD

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About