2011
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2011.014.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Value Chain Development in Central New York: CNY Bounty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative, parallel distribution systems directed at the needs and interests of midscale producers, which also employ rural residents and support rural economies [84], were an important missing element identified by a number of growers if these linkages are to improve rural livelihoods. However, these alternative distribution systems have their own challenges, and can struggle to operate profitably (e.g., [85]). Thus, continued conversations can help to define multiple strategies that meet heterogenous urban and rural stakeholder needs.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative, parallel distribution systems directed at the needs and interests of midscale producers, which also employ rural residents and support rural economies [84], were an important missing element identified by a number of growers if these linkages are to improve rural livelihoods. However, these alternative distribution systems have their own challenges, and can struggle to operate profitably (e.g., [85]). Thus, continued conversations can help to define multiple strategies that meet heterogenous urban and rural stakeholder needs.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ideal VBSC, farms, businesses, and institutions engage in collaborative partnerships characterized by shared values, trust, transparency, and shared governance (Bloom & Hinrichs, 2011;Conner et al, 2012;Renting, Marsden, & Banks, 2003;Stevenson & Pirog, 2013). Like other AFN models (farmers markets and CSAs), VBSCs seek to offer potential price premiums over commodity markets (Conner, Campbell-Arvai, & Hamm, 2008;Diamond & Barham, 2011;Hoshide, 2007;Jablonski, Perez-Burgos, & Gómez, 2011) and include goals that extend beyond profit maximization (Conner et al, 2012;Lerman, 2012). The difference is that they bring in the intermediaries with similar values to effectively market and distribute the product (Bloom & Hinrichs, 2011;Stevenson & Pirog, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been recent research efforts quantifying the profitability impacts of sales through local food markets [6,11,12], this body of work merely divides local food markets into two categories (i.e., direct-to-consumer or intermediated sales) due to data constraints. However, a handful of localized case studies provide evidence of the variability of cost structures within direct markets, particularly due to labor [13][14][15][16]. Low et al [6] highlighted that within-market differences may be related to the different levels of financial commitment required for CSA membership, compared to shopping at farmers markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%