Food shortages, stockpiling and panic buying ahead of Brexit as reported by the British media: a mixed methods content analysis

Abstract

Background On 23 June 2016, the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. From that date until the UK left the EU in January 2021, there were frequent warnings from industry and government sources of potential disruption to the food supply chain and possible food shortages. Over this period, the media had an important role in communicating on the potential impacts of Brexit. This study examines how food supply and demand, in the context of Brexit, was portrayed by the British media. Methods The study consisted of two components: (1) a quantitative analysis measuring frequency of reporting and information sources for articles on food supply and demand in the context of Brexit, in three daily newspapers, between January 2015 and January 2020; and (2) a content analysis exploring key themes and media framing of relevant issues in a subset of articles. Results Reports by the media about the impact of Brexit on the UK food system were largely absent in the six months before the UK voted to leave the EU in June 2016, increasing in frequency from mid-2018 onward, peaking in mid-2019 following the appointment of Boris Johnson as prime minister. Five themes were developed from included articles: food shortages/panic buying (appearing in 96% of articles); food chain disruption (86%); economic impacts (80%); preparation and stockpiling by the government/food sector (63%) and preparation and stockpiling by individuals (22%). Conclusion Government messaging sought to reassure the public that even under a worst-case scenario there would be no food shortages. These messages, however, contradicted warnings in the media of disruption to the food supply chain and food shortages. The media further reinforced this narrative of potential food shortages by reporting on the experiences of those preparing for Brexit by stockpiling food. The media must consider the impact of their messaging on public behaviour, as even imagined food shortages can instigate stockpiling and panic buying behaviour, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

LED Lighting: A Grower’s Guide to Light Spectra

“…There are wider impacts of these choices to be borne in mind. For example, in the United Kingdom, recent events such as Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic, and global logistical issues with shipping have demonstrated the fragility of supply chains across borders (Coleman et al 2022;Zurayk et al 2022). LED lighting, as mentioned throughout this review, can extend the growing period of crops in greenhouses and allow for year-round production in controlled environments, increasing the production of locally grown produce, which is generally less susceptible to these issues, although not totally problem free (Bayir et al 2022).…”

Managing pharmaceutical shortages during the COVID pandemic: An exploratory analysis of European collective and national government responses

“…Print media analysis with reliance on the LexisNexis data base (and drawing on language skills of the author) using search terms associated with medicine shortage, response to medicine shortage, measures taken to address/mitigate medicine shortage. In doing so, we followed the precedent of Coleman et al 23 who investigated food shortages, stockpiling and panic buying ahead of Brexit as reported by the British media…”

Configurations for positive public behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

“…Panic buying is a common phenomenon during public emergencies and has substantially undesirable social impacts [ 20 ]. The media must consider the effect of their messaging on public behavior, as even imagined food shortages can instigate excessive actions such as stockpiling and panic buying behavior, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 30 ].…”