Food security and political instability-foreign divestment analysis

Abstract

Purpose Prior studies have found evidence for the role of political instability on foreign divestment (FD) where a high level of instability encourages FD decisions. Therefore, this paper aims to examine how the food security level explains the linkage between political instability and FD. Design/methodology/approach The current study adopts the system generalised method of moment (GMM) to achieve accurate and reliable empirical evidence for 60 developing countries in the period 2011 to 2020. Findings The results demonstrated a negative and significant relationship between political instability and FD on food security. This suggests that political instability’s impact on divestment tends to be lower in countries with better levels of food security. Other controlled variables, such as economic growth, human capital and trade openness, also have a negative effect on FD, discouraging FD. Practical implications As a result, policymakers could take steps to ensure that food security levels reach acceptable levels, as food security has been linked to a country’s political stability. Originality/value To the authors limited knowledge, no studies have looked at the relationship between political instability and food security in determining a country’s FD. Our study aims to analyse this issue because the current global crisis, which is being caused by high food prices, will push millions of more people into severe poverty and exacerbate hunger and malnutrition

Linking Financial Capability, Advice, Anxiety, Social Security, and Residential Status with Outward Remittances: Evidence from the UAE

“…For instance, Vega (2015) found that the absence of social security benefits, such as healthcare and pension schemes, led migrants to return to their home country once they retired. Similarly, a study conducted by Subramaniam et al (2023) observed that migrants from countries with weak social security systems tended to remit more funds to ensure the well-being of their families.…”