Food Safety Perceptions and Practices of Older Adults

Abstract

SynopSiSobjectives. Older adults are considered more vulnerable to foodborne illness due to lowered immune function. We compared the food safety perceptions and practices of older and younger adults and determined associations with demographic characteristics.Methods. We focused on 1,317 participants 60 years of age from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's 2006 Food Safety Survey, a telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of American consumers. We used data on participants 60 years of age to compare younger and older adults, and used Pearson's Chi-square tests to determine whether perceptions and practices differed by age, gender, level of education, living arrangement, and race/ethnicity. We conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to assess relationships of demographic characteristics and food safety perceptions with food safety practices of older adults.Results. We found that adults 60 years of age were more likely to follow recommended food safety practices than those 60 years of age. Sixty-six percent of adults 60 years of age reported eating potentially hazardous foods in the past year compared with 81% of adults 60 years of age. Among people 60 years of age, women, those with less education, and nonwhite individuals generally had better food safety practices and a greater awareness of food safety risk.Conclusions. These findings suggest that certain subsets of the older adult population are less likely to follow recommended food safety practices and, thus, are at greater risk of foodborne illness. Food safety education for older adults should target men and those with more education and higher incomes.

Perceptions and Behaviors Regarding Seafood Consumption Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

“…Females were more concerned, more likely to reduce seafood consumption and more likely to be influenced by all forms of media when compared with males. This is similar to findings by Anderson et al (2011) in which women showed better food safety practices and were more aware of food safety risks compared to males. Other researchers have found that women were more likely to have higher levels of concern for food safety than men (Knight and Warland 2004).…”

The impact of socioeconomic status on foodborne illness in high-income countries: a systematic review

“…In addition, individuals with higher levels of education may be more willing to accept products that are modified to increase safety, such as irradiated beef (73). However, low SES individuals are more likely to recognize that home food preparation can be a risky activity for foodborne disease, are more likely to think refrigerator temperature is important, and are more likely to have general knowledge about appropriate food-related hygiene (16, 44, 45). …”

Public knowledge and preventive behavior during a large-scale Salmonella outbreak: results from an online survey in the Netherlands

“…To establish the influence of factors determining respondents' application of preventive measures during the outbreak (dependent variable), we performed stepwise backward regression analyses. Following [22][23][24], we included the following independent variables in the initial model: the demographics age, education, income and sex, and the factors perceived severity of a Salmonella infection, perceived severity of the outbreak, knowledge about Salmonella infections, and increased general kitchen hygiene during the outbreak. Education was recoded into a new variable with three options: Low, middle or high, while sex was included in the regression analyses as a dummy variable.…”