2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
193
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
4
193
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to ensure food safety standards is important for all products, whether of animal or vegetal origin or industrially processed, regardless of the production process, the distribution chain or their addressability (Post, 2006;Aoki, 2011;Strauss, 2014). King et al (2017) argue that without achieving the objectives of food safety and security, the objectives of sustainable development cannot be achieved.…”
Section: Review Of the Scientific Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to ensure food safety standards is important for all products, whether of animal or vegetal origin or industrially processed, regardless of the production process, the distribution chain or their addressability (Post, 2006;Aoki, 2011;Strauss, 2014). King et al (2017) argue that without achieving the objectives of food safety and security, the objectives of sustainable development cannot be achieved.…”
Section: Review Of the Scientific Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The public‐based international FSMSs have a greater scale of adoption than the industry‐based global FSMSs . This may be due to the efforts of the World Health Organization (WHO), World Trade Organization (WTO), and Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) to harmonize food safety regulations across countries (King et al, ). An increasingly important public‐based FSMS is ISO 22000 (H. Chen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Sciuto and Moro ; King et al . ). According to the CDC, about 80% of the pathogens incriminated in foodborne disease cases in the United States are still nonspecific, that is, known agents not yet identified as causing foodborne diseases, known agents whose ability to cause disease is not proven and unidentified agents, thus reinforcing the importance of the molecular epidemiology studies in the elucidation of the microbiota, especially pathogenic organisms (Scallan et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%