2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food safety control practices in in-house and outsourced foodservices and fresh vegetable suppliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported for commercial restaurants; 33% of the establishments were classified as Group 2 (30 to 69% compliance) and 67% as Group 3 (up to 30% compliance) (AKUTSU et al, 2005). Rodrigues and Salay (2012) and Saccol et al (2009) show a low level of compliance to good practice standards in Brazilian food services.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar results were reported for commercial restaurants; 33% of the establishments were classified as Group 2 (30 to 69% compliance) and 67% as Group 3 (up to 30% compliance) (AKUTSU et al, 2005). Rodrigues and Salay (2012) and Saccol et al (2009) show a low level of compliance to good practice standards in Brazilian food services.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Unsound holding conditions for the food, whether prepared or ambient, can lead to premature spoilage. These problems are exacerbated when staff are not trained in on food safe practices (Rodrigues Salay, 2012). A food service establishment may engage in preventative practices to anticipate costs before they occur.…”
Section: Cost Management and Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost management and risk mitigation Rodrigues and Salay (2012), Feigenbaum (1991), Seaman and Eves (2010) (externally mandated cost management methods) Staff training has inherent focus on plate presentation over food safety as food safe training occurs online; no real detection on food safe compliance except when it affects the quality of food; quality audits performed casually, not rigorously; and focus on taste and safety Merricks and Jones (1994), Alonso et al year; inventory levels in constant flux due to unpredictability; lack of recycling of items lead to direct waste, not perceived as significant by staff; and poor handling unspoken cause of food waste, blamed on new employees but more likely to be older employees who don't care as much Rodgers (2005), Shapton and Shapton (1991) (equipment) Equipment only minorly important to waste and was not a perceived large driver Kantor et al (1997), Chan and Au (1998) (menu specific) Large variety in popularity of items, but all prep considered equally important Par levels may not be accurate due to varying popularity Seasonal menu increases unpredictability Seasonal menu well received by staff as it changes the same old menu and Galipeau (2009) (portion size) Portion size perceived to be slightly larger than normal, starches more likely to be uneaten than proteins, understanding that misportioning occurs yet is not checked and misportioning due to laziness and acknowledged by management and not reprimanded for Panisello and Quantick (2001). (Kitchen layout)…”
Section: Cost Management and Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also questionable that the processes used by food handlers show a low percentage of irregularities (0.89%) (Table ), given that many studies indicate that food handlers have inadequate hygiene practices and lack continuous training about FBD outbreaks (Alsallaiy et al, ; Da Cunha et al, ; Gonçalves et al, ; Jianu & Golet, ; Lee et al, ; Medeiros et al, ; Rodrigues & Salay, ; Sani & Siow, ). This may suggest that the food handlers rigorously follow the Good Handling Practices, or that this information is under‐reported by the municipal inspection teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, implementation of Good Handling Practices in foodservices has become compulsory since September 2004, when a 180-day deadline was established for companies to comply with the new law (Brazil, 2004). Although more than 10 years has passed since promulgation of the law and the existence of an agency responsible for its supervision, studies show that foodservices in Brazil (Cortese, Veiros, Feldman, & Cavalli, 2016;Da Cunha, Stedefeldt, & Rosso, 2014;Rodrigues & Salay, 2012) and other countries (Alsallaiy et al, 2016;Jianu & Golet, 2014;Knight, Worosz, & Todd, 2007;Lee et al, 2014;Sarter & Sarter, 2012;Sani & Siow, 2014) have difficulty in complying with Good Handling Practices. This reinforces the importance of care for food handling at these establishments.…”
Section: Implementation Of Good Handling Practices In Foodservices Ismentioning
confidence: 99%