Food Safety Conditions in Home-Kitchens: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Federal District/Brazil

Abstract

<jats:p>This study aimed to analyze the food safety conditions in home kitchens from the Brazilian Federal District. A previously validated instrument composed of 77 items (in four blocks) was used to evaluate the safety conditions in home kitchens. A survey was carried out with on-site application with 226 home kitchens’ food handlers in the Federal District, Brazil to evaluate Brazilian home kitchens’ good practices. Of the home kitchen food handlers, most of them were female (64.6%), had completed undergraduate education (29.2%), and were 45–59 years old (23.5%). The visited households had an average of 3.38 ± 1.48 residents that ate some of their meals at home, and 40% declared the monthly family income to be between 5 and 15 Brazilian minimum wages (MW). Regarding the reliability of the instrument, from the KR-20 test, it was verified that the instrument presents good internal consistency (α = 0.758). According to the instrument classification, the home kitchens’ sample was considered as at a medium risk of food contamination (46.5% of them presented from 51 to 75% of conformities to the instrument). There was a statistical difference between house-kitchens with a family income from zero to one minimum wage (MW) and those receiving from 5 to 15 MW (p = 0.017), as well as between those from zero to one MW and who earn above 15 MW (p = 0.009). The result of the on-site evaluation shows that the instrument was able to measure food safety conditions in Brazilian Federal District domestic kitchens. Such findings can contribute positively to the development of actions in health education that help in the adoption of good practices of food manipulation and, consequently, in the reduction in foodborne disease outbreaks in residences.</jats:p>

Behavioral predictors of household food-safety practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Extending the theory of planned behavior

“…In addition, data from a range of different periods confirm the same scenario ( Draeger et al, 2019 ; Finger et al, 2019 ). Unlike restaurants, home environments do not have food-preparation, handling, or storage guidelines ( Farias et al, 2020 ), given the heterogeneous profiles of residents ( Scott, 2001 ) and the many different ways that kitchen environments are used ( Wills et al, 2015 ). This increases the risk of foodborne diseases.…”

Developing a Messaging Graphic for Storage Times of Refrigerated Ready to Eat (RTE) Foods for a Consumer Food Safety Health Campaign

“…An increasing number of consumer studies have shown that consumers are not handling and storing food properly. For example, various studies tracking shopping, storage, or preparation in-home have shown that many consumers risk of foodborne illness from improper handling of food [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Even when preparing food at laboratory kitchen sites, consumers have shown that they often do not follow recommended practices [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], which can result in cross contamination.…”

A survey to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with the risk of foodborne infection in a sample of Sicilian general population

“…Studies in many countries have been conducted to evaluate consumer food safety practices, adopting different approaches such as questionnaires and surveys, interviews, and observational studies [14] , [26] – [29] .…”