2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-007-0874-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food resource use in a tropical eastern Pacific tidepool fish assemblage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
31
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although literature data suggest that R. rutilus may utilize a wide variety of resources depending on environmental circumstances (Persson, 1983; Bergman & Greenberg, 1994; Specziár et al ., 1997; Vinni et al ., 2000), no such diverse diet ontogeny as observed in the present study has been documented earlier. Previous studies on trophic guild structure of fish assemblages which also considered ontogenetic diet changes generally distinguished only two to four subjectively set size classes per species (Muñoz & Ojeda, 1998; Garrison & Link, 2000; Inoue et al ., 2005; Castellanos‐Galindo & Giraldo, 2008). These studies mainly dealt with marine fish assemblages and, similar to the present observations, found that particular species participated in one to three trophic guilds during the life span.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although literature data suggest that R. rutilus may utilize a wide variety of resources depending on environmental circumstances (Persson, 1983; Bergman & Greenberg, 1994; Specziár et al ., 1997; Vinni et al ., 2000), no such diverse diet ontogeny as observed in the present study has been documented earlier. Previous studies on trophic guild structure of fish assemblages which also considered ontogenetic diet changes generally distinguished only two to four subjectively set size classes per species (Muñoz & Ojeda, 1998; Garrison & Link, 2000; Inoue et al ., 2005; Castellanos‐Galindo & Giraldo, 2008). These studies mainly dealt with marine fish assemblages and, similar to the present observations, found that particular species participated in one to three trophic guilds during the life span.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Italicised entries indicate a significant difference between the diets of P. longispinis between depths a denotes a prey category that made the greatest contribution to the diet of medium-sized P. longispinis in the depth strata listed at the top of the column teristics of predators (Bolnick et al 2002;Pusineri et al 2008) as well as prey behaviour, (Bolnick et al 2002;Castellanos-Galindo and Giraldo 2008), abundance (Zekeria et al 2002;Collins et al 2007;Castellanos-Galindo and Giraldo 2008), and the influence of habitat on each of these factors (Bethea et al 2007;Collins et al 2007;Weitkamp and Sturdevant 2008) are additional mechanisms by which food resources can be partitioned between species. As prey resources were only partially partitioned between the Platycephalid species presented here, the interaction of all the above factors are likely to play an important role in the way in which these species partition food resources and successfully co-exist.…”
Section: Teleosts Polychaetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way in which fish assemblages partition food resources is considered evidence of evolution driven by past competitive pressures (Wimberger 1994;Castellanos-Galindo and Giraldo 2008). As such, studying how food is partitioned between species may provide an insight into the functional role of different species within an ecosystem (Hajisamae et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castellanos‐Galindo and Giraldo () studied the diet of juveniles in transient fish species in Colombia, namely Abudefduf concolor (Gill, 1862), Abudefduf troschelii (Gill, 1862), Halichoeres aestuaricola (Bussing, 1972), Chaenomugil proboscideus (Günther, 1861) and Echidna nocturna (Cope, 1872). In the Castellanos‐Galindo and Giraldo () study, A. concolor and A. troschelii were considered herbivorous and specialist feeder species, feeding mainly on macroalgae and diatoms; H. aestuaricola was considered a carnivorous species, feeding on bivalves, copepods and amphipods; C. proboscideus was considered an herbivorous and a macroalgae specialist feeder species; and E. nocturna was considered an exclusively carnivorous species, feeding on shrimps, brachyurans and stomatopods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%