2021
DOI: 10.1086/716661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Plant Shifts Drive the Diversification of Sack-Bearer Moths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we recovered multiple topologies for the backbone of Noctuoidea (see Results), we date several possible trees independently rather than picking a tree for dating analyses a priori . Our dating method follows the ML method employed by St Laurent et al (2021), which includes a custom pipeline of python scripts for running multiple TreePL (Smith and O’Meara 2012) analyses in parallel to combine into a single “consensus” dated tree. This allows for ranges of divergence times at every node, which is useful since a single TreePL run obtains only a single age at each node (see File S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we recovered multiple topologies for the backbone of Noctuoidea (see Results), we date several possible trees independently rather than picking a tree for dating analyses a priori . Our dating method follows the ML method employed by St Laurent et al (2021), which includes a custom pipeline of python scripts for running multiple TreePL (Smith and O’Meara 2012) analyses in parallel to combine into a single “consensus” dated tree. This allows for ranges of divergence times at every node, which is useful since a single TreePL run obtains only a single age at each node (see File S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our dating method follows the ML method employed by St Laurent et al (2021), which includes a custom pipeline of python scripts for running multiple TreePL (Smith and O'Meara 2012) analyses in parallel to combine into a single "consensus" dated tree. This allows for ranges of S3.…”
Section: Divergence Time Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to difficulties in inferring divergence times with large genomic datasets, we performed ML analyses that could accommodate large datasets of hundreds of loci at once. For more traditional, computationally intensive Bayesian dating approaches, we subsampled our dataset, reducing the number of loci used in downstream analyses (Jarvis et al 2014, Misof et al 2014, Prum et al 2015, Smith et al 2018, Kawahara et al 2019, St Laurent et al 2021). Regardless of the analysis employed, we used nine secondary calibrations derived from Kawahara et al (2019), the most comprehensively fossil-calibrated chronogram of Lepidoptera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TreePL outputs divergence times as single dates per node. In order to provide a range of dates for each divergence event, we performed TreePL independently 100 times and summarized results, following the approach of St Laurent et al (74). This method uses several custom Python scripts (available at https://github.com/sunray1/treepl) and creates 100 bootstrap replicates generated in RAxML (75) using the 425-locus data matrix, partitioned according to the same 69 partitions inferred with ModelFinder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%