2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food neophobia and its relation with olfactory ability in common odour identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other potential factors that could mediate effects of food neophobia on diet and weight include chemosensory exploration and perceptions (41) . Food neophobics have been found to rate odours as less pleasant, sniff odour samples less vigorously (42) and identify fewer odours correctly (28) than food neophilics. Limitations of the present study include the large proportion of self-reported data and the cross-sectional design of analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other potential factors that could mediate effects of food neophobia on diet and weight include chemosensory exploration and perceptions (41) . Food neophobics have been found to rate odours as less pleasant, sniff odour samples less vigorously (42) and identify fewer odours correctly (28) than food neophilics. Limitations of the present study include the large proportion of self-reported data and the cross-sectional design of analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No standardized or widely followed diagnostic cut-off values exist for classifying individuals as 'food neophobics' and 'food neophilics' based on their FNS score (12) . Often the sample mean (or median) FNS score (18,24,(27)(28)(29) , or the score 35 (30) , has been used as the cut-off value to categorize study participants into two groups. Another common practice is to use the mean plus/minus one standard deviation as cut-off values (11,14,31,32) to form three groups.…”
Section: Food Neophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knaapila et al (2011) reported that (especially in women) this attitude appears to be strongly genetically determined. The results of the studies conducted so far on gender differences are still quite inconclusive: Some authors have found that women are more neophobic than men (Frank and van der Klaauw, 1994), some authors described instead the contrary (Tuorila et al, 2001), whilst some others failed to find any differences at all (Flight et al, 2003; Nordin et al, 2004; Meiselman et al, 2010; Demattè et al, 2013). A clearer link has instead been described between food neophobia and age.…”
Section: Food Neophobia and Individual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This scale has been successfully used to predict people’s attitude toward new foods and the expected liking of food products, and has been adapted for children administration (“Children Food Neophobia Scale”, CFNS; Pliner, 1994). It has also been translated into different languages and cultures (e.g., for Italian, see Demattè et al, 2013; for Spanish, see Fernández-Ruiz et al, 2013; for Chilean, see Schnettler et al, 2013; for Finnish, see Tuorila et al, 2001; for Japanese, see Yamada et al, 2012). Recently, the FNS has also been adapted to the fruit and vegetable domain (“Fruit and Vegetable Neophobia Instrument”, FVNI; Hollar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Attitudes Toward Food: the Case Of Food Neophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation