2016
DOI: 10.6027/tn2016-529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food losses and waste in primary production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(11 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, there is a dearth of studies quantifying avoidable food loss due to cosmetic standards and its embedded greenhouse gas emissions. Estimates at this life cycle stage are usually based upon a small number of studies carried out on just a few crops and applied to entire regions (Gustavsson et al, 2011), although others are more locally focused (Franke et al, 2016;Hartikainen et al, 2018). Some studies omit losses in the production phase entirely due to uncertainties (Monier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there is a dearth of studies quantifying avoidable food loss due to cosmetic standards and its embedded greenhouse gas emissions. Estimates at this life cycle stage are usually based upon a small number of studies carried out on just a few crops and applied to entire regions (Gustavsson et al, 2011), although others are more locally focused (Franke et al, 2016;Hartikainen et al, 2018). Some studies omit losses in the production phase entirely due to uncertainties (Monier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the data attribute drawback in actual exploitation volume would weaken the analysis accuracy. Another field-based residue for networkbased accessibility and logistical analysis could be the yet unexploited residual biomasses in vegetable production (Franke et al, 2016;Lehto et al, 2018;Pahkala et al, 2009).…”
Section: Replicability Of the Research Frame And Applicability Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further information on the project, the results and the study methods used are presented in the project report by Franke et al 2016.…”
Section: Reading Instructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%