2010
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food intake and risk of basal cell carcinoma in an 11-year prospective study of Australian adults

Abstract: Background/Objective: Experimental studies suggest that dietary factors may influence skin cancer risk, but there have been few human studies of diet and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the most common type of skin cancer. The objective was to prospectively investigate the association between food intake and incidence of BCC skin cancers. Subjects/Methods: At baseline in 1992, 1056 adults in a subtropical Australian community completed a validated foodfrequency questionnaire from which we estimated the intake of 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our overall null results are consistent with several observational studies that found no association between fat intake(16, 17) or vegetable and fruit intake(15, 17, 18) and risk of NMSCs (i.e., basal cell and/or squamous cell carcinomas). A 4-year prospective study of 73,366 women without history of skin cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study found no overall association between dietary fat intake and incidence of basal cell carcinoma(16), while an 8-year prospective study of 43,217 men without history of skin cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study found that higher percent energy from total fat was associated with lower risk of basal cell carcinoma(18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our overall null results are consistent with several observational studies that found no association between fat intake(16, 17) or vegetable and fruit intake(15, 17, 18) and risk of NMSCs (i.e., basal cell and/or squamous cell carcinomas). A 4-year prospective study of 73,366 women without history of skin cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study found no overall association between dietary fat intake and incidence of basal cell carcinoma(16), while an 8-year prospective study of 43,217 men without history of skin cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study found that higher percent energy from total fat was associated with lower risk of basal cell carcinoma(18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding was not supported by our null results for tea alone, as well as studies of SCC [53, 56] and BCC [56]. This could in part be due to the wide variety of types of tea and their differing bioactive components, and the potential for high levels of some phenolics in tea to induce oxidative DNA damage [57].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, due to its rapid metastasis and chemotherapy resistance, melanoma is the least common form but most lethal malignancy derived from melanocytes 5 . Evidence strongly suggests that excessive ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, ozone depletion, genetic and dietary factors, and lifestyle are associated with the development of skin cancer 6,7 . It is well known that skin cancer results from cocarcinogenic effects of different events, such as UVR‐induced DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune suppression 6,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Evidence strongly suggests that excessive ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, ozone depletion, Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wiley onlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen Terms genetic and dietary factors, and lifestyle are associated with the development of skin cancer. 6,7 It is well known that skin cancer results from cocarcinogenic effects of different events, such as UVRinduced DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune suppression. 6,8 Therefore, many natural dietary agents have received considerable attention because of their biological effects, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%