2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2006.00100.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food‐induced anaphylaxis caused by ingestion of royal jelly

Abstract: We report a case of food-induced anaphylaxis caused by ingestion of royal jelly. After taking royal jelly and several other medicinal products, a 33-year-old Japanese male developed severe facial pruritus and erythema, followed by vertigo, numbness in his fingers, generalized pruritus, wheals, dyspnea, wheezing and impaired consciousness. He was treated with corticosteroid and fluid therapy, and his symptoms subsided. Upon allergy testing, his only positive reaction was to royal jelly. Given the clinical sympt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors recommend testing for allergic reactions prior to clinical investigations (Leung et al, 1997;Lombardi et al, 1998;Takahama and Shimazu, 2006). In the future it is important to do additional investigations about the specific antibacterial activity of strong insoluble polyphenolprotein complexes in royal jelly and rape honey mixes for different microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors recommend testing for allergic reactions prior to clinical investigations (Leung et al, 1997;Lombardi et al, 1998;Takahama and Shimazu, 2006). In the future it is important to do additional investigations about the specific antibacterial activity of strong insoluble polyphenolprotein complexes in royal jelly and rape honey mixes for different microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibacterial activity of the peptide Royalisin against Gram-positive bacteria has been known since 1990 (Fujiwara et al, 1990;Shen et al, 2010). On the other hand, RJ may cause allergic reactions in humans, asthma, fatal anaphylaxis, thus this product remains non-approved for use in most countries (Leung et al, 1997;Lombardi et al, 1998;Takahama and Shimazu, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RJ may cause allergic reactions in humans, asthma, to even fatal anaphylaxis, thus this product remains unaffordable in most countries (Leung et al, 1997;Lombardi et al, 1998;Takahama and Shimazu, 2006).…”
Section: Introduction/ уводmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RJ may cause allergic reactions in humans, asthma and even fatal anaphylaxis; thus this product remains unaffordable in most countries (Leung et al, 1997;Lombardi et al, 1998;Takahama and Shimazu, 2006). From another perspective, it was found to have more positive effect of RJ: imunostimulating, activating vegetative and central neural systems etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%