2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food fraud vulnerability assessment: Towards a global consensus on procedures to manage and mitigate food fraud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Food safety is a global problem as almost one in ten people worldwide fall sick due to contaminated food, and 420,000 die every year due to foodborne diseases [ 1 ]; however, consumers’ awareness of food safety remains modest worldwide [ 2 , 3 ]. Recent food frauds, such as melamine in infant formula milk in China [ 4 ], horsemeat in beef burgers in Ireland [ 5 ] and food safety risks such as mad cow disease [ 6 ], have increasingly captured public attention [ 7 ]. Subsequently, consumers have lost confidence in food safety in developed and developing countries [ 8 ]; however, food safety problems are especially severe in developing countries [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food safety is a global problem as almost one in ten people worldwide fall sick due to contaminated food, and 420,000 die every year due to foodborne diseases [ 1 ]; however, consumers’ awareness of food safety remains modest worldwide [ 2 , 3 ]. Recent food frauds, such as melamine in infant formula milk in China [ 4 ], horsemeat in beef burgers in Ireland [ 5 ] and food safety risks such as mad cow disease [ 6 ], have increasingly captured public attention [ 7 ]. Subsequently, consumers have lost confidence in food safety in developed and developing countries [ 8 ]; however, food safety problems are especially severe in developing countries [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability to food fraud extends beyond credence-based foods to all foods so effective counter-fraud strategies need to be in place. The lack of consensus on developing a standardized process for food fraud vulnerability assessment needs to be addressed [115,116]. The case studies in this paper however show that whilst some organizations can develop counter-fraud strategies to address organic food fraud, by the nature of the fraud undertaken (substitution, mislabeling); the organizations involved will still seek to deceive others especially if there is a reliance on institutional trust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The economic effect can be analysed in the form of money, which includes a decrease in sales, legal fees and product recall. Apart from the decrease in sales, the decrease of consumer trust towards the products could also be considered as the economic effect of this food fraud (Barrere et al, 2020). The other impact would be health impact as illustrated by Johnson (2014), whereby he contended that the practice of food fraud would bring unintended negative repercussions towards the consumer in certain cases, even though this practice is generally harmless to human health.…”
Section: Consumerism Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%