2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00074-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food consumption and body weight changes with neotame, a new sweetener with intense taste: differentiating effects of palatability from toxicity in dietary safety studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decrease in body weight/body weight gain after feeding laboratory animals with high doses of intense sweeteners is a phenomenon associated with poor palatability and/or lower nutritional value of the diets containing high concentrations of the test material (Chowaniec and Hicks, 1979;Grice and Goldsmith, 2000;Flamm et al, 2003;Mahew et al, 2003). The lower body weight/body weight gain of variable severity were seen at dietary concentration of 50 000 mg advantame/kg diet in some of the subchronic toxicity studies (apart from 13-week study in rats and 1-year study in dogs), in the carcinogenicity study in mice and in the combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decrease in body weight/body weight gain after feeding laboratory animals with high doses of intense sweeteners is a phenomenon associated with poor palatability and/or lower nutritional value of the diets containing high concentrations of the test material (Chowaniec and Hicks, 1979;Grice and Goldsmith, 2000;Flamm et al, 2003;Mahew et al, 2003). The lower body weight/body weight gain of variable severity were seen at dietary concentration of 50 000 mg advantame/kg diet in some of the subchronic toxicity studies (apart from 13-week study in rats and 1-year study in dogs), in the carcinogenicity study in mice and in the combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decrease in body weight/body weight gain after feeding laboratory animals with high doses of intense sweeteners is a known phenomenon (Chowaniec and Hicks, 1979;Grice and Goldsmith, 2000;Flamm et al, 2003;Mahew et al, 2003) associated with poor palatability and/or lower nutritional value of the diets containing high concentrations of sweeteners. In the 13-week study in mice the lower body weight gain (89% of the control) was additionally recorded in the low-dose female group.…”
Section: Subacute and Subchronic Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced body weight and body weight gain were the only consistent finding in neotame safety studies. The authors concluded, that these changes were adequately explained by the small decrements in feed consumption, and that consideration of the objective criteria proposed in the first study (Flamm et al, 2003) supported the conclusion that reduced body weight and body weight gain observed in neotame studies were neither adverse nor a manifestation of toxicity, and that they were not appropriate endpoints for setting NOEL and ADI for neotame (Mahew et al, 2003) …”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Two studies, submitted by the petitioner, investigated whether the changes in body weight gain in sub-chronic, chronic and carcinogenicity studies with neotame were adverse or secondary to decrements in feed consumption (Flamm et al, 2003, Mahew et al, 2003.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of neotame has been investigated and the results indicate that neotame is not carcinogenic, genotoxic, teratogenic, or associated with any reproductive toxicity (Scientific Opinion 2007). However, 3,3-dimethylbutyraldehyde, a highly flammable component used in the synthesis of neotame, may cause minor side effects such as irritation to the skin, eyes, respiratory, and reproductive systems after prolonged consumption (Mayhew, Comer, and Stargel 2003;Tomasik 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%