Abstract:OBJECTIVES: This study examines the effects of branding and packaging on young children's taste preferences. METHODS: Preschool children aged 3 to 5 (n=65) tasted five pairs of identical foods in packaging from McDonald's and in matched packaging that was either plain, Starbucks-branded, or colourful (but unbranded). Children were asked if the foods tasted the same or if one tasted better. RESULTS: Children preferred the taste of foods wrapped in decorative wrappings, relying more on aesthetics than on familia… Show more
“…After tasting the foods, children were significantly more likely to state that the McDonalds branded foods tasted better than the matched plain-packaged pair (p<0.001) for both healthy and non-healthy foods. This study was replicated in Canadian children (n=65, 3-5 years) with similar findings, but noting highly colourful packaging, as typically found in non-healthy foods targeting children, was also influential [74].…”
Section: Experimental Studies Using Brand Endorserssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This included studies that manipulated exposures to TV advertising [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], Internet advergames [67][68][69][70], product placement in movies [71,72], brand endorsers [28, 29, [73][74][75] and premium offers [76,77].…”
Section: Experimental Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported above, the majority of these studies examined the acute, short-term effects of marketing on children's food behaviours (3-12 years). Many utilised between-subject study designs with children randomised to conditions (n = 63 -1302) [56,[60][61][62][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]; the remainder within-subject, counterbalanced designs with randomisation to condition order with a washout-period of more than two weeks (n=42-281) [ As previously mentioned, conducting experimental studies in this domain over longer periods is methodologically challenging and expensive [39] and, as such, research of this nature is limited. Two studies, however, give insight to the longer effects of food advertising exposure.…”
Section: Experimental Studies Using Premium Offersmentioning
The prevention of overweight in childhood is paramount to long term heart-health. Food marketing predominately promotes unhealthy products which if over-consumed will lead to overweight. International health expert calls for further restriction of children's exposure to food marketing remain relatively unheeded, with a lack of evidence showing a causal link between food marketing and children's dietary behaviours and obesity an oft cited reason for this policy inertia. This direct link is difficult to measure and quantify with a multiplicity of determinants contributing to dietary intake and the development of overweight. The Bradford Hill Criteria provide a credible framework by which epidemiological studies may be examined to consider whether a causal interpretation of an observed association is valid. This paper draws upon current evidence that examines the relationship between food marketing, across a range of different media, and children's food behaviours, and appraises these studies against Bradford Hill's causality framework.
IntroductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is largely preventable, yet, globally, it contributes to the greatest burden of premature mortality [1]. Modifiable, diet-related CVD risk factors include overweight and obesity and high consumption of saturated and trans fatty acids, refined carbohydrates and sodium [2,3]. Establishing healthy dietary behaviours and maintaining a healthy weight in childhood is paramount for maximising heart-health [4], however within our current food environment, this has never been more challenging.
“…After tasting the foods, children were significantly more likely to state that the McDonalds branded foods tasted better than the matched plain-packaged pair (p<0.001) for both healthy and non-healthy foods. This study was replicated in Canadian children (n=65, 3-5 years) with similar findings, but noting highly colourful packaging, as typically found in non-healthy foods targeting children, was also influential [74].…”
Section: Experimental Studies Using Brand Endorserssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This included studies that manipulated exposures to TV advertising [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], Internet advergames [67][68][69][70], product placement in movies [71,72], brand endorsers [28, 29, [73][74][75] and premium offers [76,77].…”
Section: Experimental Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported above, the majority of these studies examined the acute, short-term effects of marketing on children's food behaviours (3-12 years). Many utilised between-subject study designs with children randomised to conditions (n = 63 -1302) [56,[60][61][62][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]; the remainder within-subject, counterbalanced designs with randomisation to condition order with a washout-period of more than two weeks (n=42-281) [ As previously mentioned, conducting experimental studies in this domain over longer periods is methodologically challenging and expensive [39] and, as such, research of this nature is limited. Two studies, however, give insight to the longer effects of food advertising exposure.…”
Section: Experimental Studies Using Premium Offersmentioning
The prevention of overweight in childhood is paramount to long term heart-health. Food marketing predominately promotes unhealthy products which if over-consumed will lead to overweight. International health expert calls for further restriction of children's exposure to food marketing remain relatively unheeded, with a lack of evidence showing a causal link between food marketing and children's dietary behaviours and obesity an oft cited reason for this policy inertia. This direct link is difficult to measure and quantify with a multiplicity of determinants contributing to dietary intake and the development of overweight. The Bradford Hill Criteria provide a credible framework by which epidemiological studies may be examined to consider whether a causal interpretation of an observed association is valid. This paper draws upon current evidence that examines the relationship between food marketing, across a range of different media, and children's food behaviours, and appraises these studies against Bradford Hill's causality framework.
IntroductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is largely preventable, yet, globally, it contributes to the greatest burden of premature mortality [1]. Modifiable, diet-related CVD risk factors include overweight and obesity and high consumption of saturated and trans fatty acids, refined carbohydrates and sodium [2,3]. Establishing healthy dietary behaviours and maintaining a healthy weight in childhood is paramount for maximising heart-health [4], however within our current food environment, this has never been more challenging.
“…La littérature portait sur l'exposition à la publicité alimentaire destinée aux enfants au Canada et sur le pouvoir ou les répercussions qu'elle a sur ceuxci en général 36,40 , à la télévision 34,4148 , sur Internet 4951 , dans les écoles publiques 52 , sur les emballages de produits dans les épiceries 35,37,5358 et dans les restaurants rapides 59,60 (tableau 3). La plupart des arti cles étaient fondés sur des études transver sales (n = 14) 34,37,4245,4956 .…”
Section: Résultatsunclassified
“…TABLEAU 1 (suite) Types de réglementation en matière de publicité alimentaire destinée aux enfants au Canada 48,59,60 , une a utilisé des méthodes transversales 49 et cinq ont eu recours à des méthodes qualitatives 35,36,40,57,58 .…”
RésuméIntroduction : La publicité alimentaire a des répercussions sur les connaissances et les comportements alimentaires des enfants ainsi que sur leur santé. La réglementation actu elle au Canada est axée sur la restriction des aspects promotionnels de la publicité alimen taire, mais elle accorde peu d'attention, voire aucune, à l'endroit où se fait l'expérience alimentaire des enfants. Il est essentiel de comprendre où s'inscrit la publicité alimentaire dans le quotidien des enfants pour pouvoir les protéger. Notre étude fait état de la littéra ture sur la publicité alimentaire destinée aux enfants au Canada en fonction du contexte.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.