1981
DOI: 10.1177/053901848102000101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food and culture: Measuring the intricacy of rule systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These ideals provide the standards used as reference points by individuals to assess and judge food behaviors as "right," "normal," "inappropriate," or "unacceptable." For example, a meal has a cultural grammar for the type and proportions of foods, like the English meal formula for a proper meal of A+2b that represents a main dish plus two side dishes [65][66][67]. People are socialized and acculturated into cultural and subcultural ideals that they selectively invoke and perform in constructing food choices.…”
Section: Life Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideals provide the standards used as reference points by individuals to assess and judge food behaviors as "right," "normal," "inappropriate," or "unacceptable." For example, a meal has a cultural grammar for the type and proportions of foods, like the English meal formula for a proper meal of A+2b that represents a main dish plus two side dishes [65][66][67]. People are socialized and acculturated into cultural and subcultural ideals that they selectively invoke and perform in constructing food choices.…”
Section: Life Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Some pots were strung from rafters; sequence of three courses of decreasing importance: (1) a hot and savory main course; (2) a sweet dessert course, either hot or cold, based on a grain dish containing some wisp of fruit, or a fruit dish with a sauce made of liquid custard or cream; (3) a hot beverage and a cold biscuit (i.e., a cookie) (Douglas 1972;Douglas and Nicod 1974;Douglas and Gross 1981). An aesthetically pleasing decorative appearance was an important element of the second course; this practice appeared in 19th-century British texts imported into New England, where it was initially adopted by upper-class families.…”
Section: New England's Anglo-american Culinary Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of food sharing associated with daily subsistence activities in Helvetia includes regular meals at the dinner table, as well as food sharing that was more informal in nature (e.g., snacks, which Douglas and Gross [1981] separate from meals in terms of the rules that guide them; snacks are informal, unstructured, and outside the domain of meals). Formal dinners were generally associated with holiday gatherings and celebrations among family and extended family members.…”
Section: Formal and Informal Contexts Of Meal Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%