DOI: 10.11606/d.11.2010.tde-03082010-095033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fontes de zinco e cobre de origem secundária: caracterização, solubilidade e disponibilidade à plantas de arroz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, brass slag I had an efficiency of 67 % and brass slag II of 27 % (Table 7), with different chemical compositions, oxide versus silicate (Table 3), respectively, which must have influenced the efficiency of these industrial by-products. These results were similar to those found by Moura (2010), who evaluated the agronomic efficiency of two brass slags and two fertilizers were prepared with pure oxides for analysis in rice plants. The author reported high efficiency (94 %) for Zn source in the form of oxide and bonded with the Cu forming a metallic alloy, containing 14.7 % SiO 2 and lower efficiency (42 %) for the other slag with Zn in the form of oxide and silicate, containing 44.7 % SiO 2 .…”
Section: Phase Ii: Availability Of Zn To Maize Plantssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, brass slag I had an efficiency of 67 % and brass slag II of 27 % (Table 7), with different chemical compositions, oxide versus silicate (Table 3), respectively, which must have influenced the efficiency of these industrial by-products. These results were similar to those found by Moura (2010), who evaluated the agronomic efficiency of two brass slags and two fertilizers were prepared with pure oxides for analysis in rice plants. The author reported high efficiency (94 %) for Zn source in the form of oxide and bonded with the Cu forming a metallic alloy, containing 14.7 % SiO 2 and lower efficiency (42 %) for the other slag with Zn in the form of oxide and silicate, containing 44.7 % SiO 2 .…”
Section: Phase Ii: Availability Of Zn To Maize Plantssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The Zn solubility in brass slag II, on the other hand, where the element is contained in the form of silicate (Table 3), was high only in the extractant solutions of 2% CA, 10 % SA and 10 % HCl, indicating that silicate-bound Zn is less soluble in the studied extractors. Differences in the mineralogical composition of brass slag with effects on the behavior of various extractors were reported by Moura (2010): in brass slag with 25.3 % Zn (total content) and 14.7 % SiO 2 , Zn was found in oxidized forms (ZnO), associated with Cu forming alloy (CuZn), as mineral gahnita (ZnAl 2 O 4 ) and willemite (Zn 2 SiO 4 ) with no statistical difference between Zn extraction by HCl, aqua regia, USEPA 3050 B modified by Moraes (2009), by 2 % CA and NAC and with lowest extraction by water. Another brass slag evaluated with 18 % Zn (total content) and 44.7 % SiO 2 contained Zn as oxide and silicate, however, Zn extraction decreased in the extractors aqua regia, HCl, 2 % CA, NAC, USEPA 3050 B adapted by Moraes (2009), and water.…”
Section: Levels Of Soluble Zn In 2 Nd Extractorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At pH 2.3, the deprotonation of the three carboxyl groups from the molecules of citric acid, which is a condition for the release of oxygen as an electron donor group to the metal chelate, is more difficult (Alcarde and Ponchio, 1979), resulting in a complexing action of lower intensity in the 2 % CA solution than in NAC. Other authors also reported higher solubility of Cu sources in the NAC extractant compared to 2 % CA (Bastos et al, 2007a;Moura, 2010).…”
Section: Mineralogical Characterization Of Cu Sources and Extracted Cmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Interestingly, the granulated Cu fertilizer did not reach the required minimum solubility (Table 4), although it is registered and authorized by MAPA for the market. This fertilizer contains Cu in the form of alloy (urusovite), carbonate (malachite and azurita) and sulfide (chalcopyrite) (Table 3), which are chemical forms known for their lower solubility (Bastos et al, 2007a;Moura, 2010).…”
Section: Mineralogical Characterization Of Cu Sources and Extracted Cmentioning
confidence: 99%