2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-008-0282-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foncteur de Picard d’un champ algébrique

Abstract: RésuméIn this article we study the Picard functor and the Picard stack of an algebraic stack. We give a new and direct proof of the representability of the Picard stack. We prove that it is quasi-separated, and that the connected component of the identity is proper when the fibers of X are geometrically normal. We study some examples of Picard functors of classical stacks. In an appendix, we review the lisse-étale cohomology of abelian sheaves on an algebraic stack.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That Pic C/S is algebraic is a standard application of Artin's criterion for verifying that a stack is algebraic [5], and can also be seen as a Homstack. See [6] for details.…”
Section: Twisted Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That Pic C/S is algebraic is a standard application of Artin's criterion for verifying that a stack is algebraic [5], and can also be seen as a Homstack. See [6] for details.…”
Section: Twisted Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result on torsors under Picard S-2-stacks allows us to obtain the two categorical dimensions higher generalization of Grothendieck's study of extensions via torsors done in [12]. In this setting of translating between algebrogeometric information and categorical information we can cite also the paper [18, p. 64] where Mumford introduced the notion of invertible sheaves on a S-stack (categorical side) and the paper [9,Prop. 2.1.2] where Brochard computed the homological interpretation of such invertible sheaves (algebro-geometric side).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For the proof, as in [1] XII we treat separately the case of a nilpotent immersion, and then we use non-flat descent. However, the proof given here is much simpler than the proof given (for the particular case of schemes) in [1], due to the use of the representability theorem by an algebraic space for Pic X /S (see [4] and [7]). We do not need to prove the representability of f * , but only its quasi-affineness and its quasi-compactness.…”
Section: A Relative Representability Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%