2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2875520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Folo: Latency and Quality Optimized Task Allocation in Vehicular Fog Computing

Abstract: With the emerging vehicular applications such as real-time situational awareness and cooperative lane change, there exist huge demands for sufficient computing resources at the edge to conduct time-critical and data-intensive tasks. This paper proposes Folo, a novel solution for latency and quality optimized task allocation in Vehicular Fog Computing (VFC). Folo is designed to support the mobility of vehicles, including vehicles that generate tasks and the others that serve as fog nodes. Considering constraint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To trade the quality of computation tasks result for reducing response time and saving extra energy, Li et al [21] applied the scalable computing in a heterogeneous edge computing environment and selected separate Quality-of-Result level for each edge node. An event-triggered dynamic task allocation framework was designed in [22] that studied the trade-off between the service latency and computing quality loss. Moreover, Gao et al [23] investigated the optimal tradeoff between user experience and resources consumption in designing the MEC systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To trade the quality of computation tasks result for reducing response time and saving extra energy, Li et al [21] applied the scalable computing in a heterogeneous edge computing environment and selected separate Quality-of-Result level for each edge node. An event-triggered dynamic task allocation framework was designed in [22] that studied the trade-off between the service latency and computing quality loss. Moreover, Gao et al [23] investigated the optimal tradeoff between user experience and resources consumption in designing the MEC systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resource requirements vary with different applications. An application can be decomposed into a set of tasks, and each task is considered to be the basic unit for service scheduling [22]. For example, AR-based driving assistance consists of tasks such as object recognition and video streaming.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the responding messages, the client vehicle can choose one fog node for offloading. In this paper, we just adopt a simple fog node selection scheme, in which the client vehicle would select the fog node with the shortest communication distance for task offloading [6], [18].…”
Section: B Process Of Chameleonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, offloading these tasks to the cloud is not applicable, due to the remarkable transmission delay. Thus, the concept of vehicular fog computing has been proposed and widely explored by plenty of works [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Xiao et al [19] proposed to turn commercial fleets into fog nodes to serve neighboring vehicles and passengers, while Hou et al [18] suggested utilizing the extra computing power on slow moving or parked vehicles.…”
Section: B Vehicular Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Zhu et at. [21], [22] designed a system for latency and performance balanced task offloading for video transmission and processing in vehicular networking.…”
Section: B Vehicular Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%