2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-019-00394-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following the money? Performance-based funding and the changing publication patterns of Finnish academics

Abstract: Research on how performance-based funding influences the behaviour and performance of academics is limited in Europe. In this study, we investigate the changing publication patterns among Finnish academics associated with the introduction of awarding funding for publications within specific journals in the national performance-based funding model. We find evidence, particularly in the social sciences, and to a lesser extent humanities, that Finnish academics increasingly target international (English-language)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the bibliometric understanding of scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct (Hall 2011). Supporting native languages in science, which may have specific research-related terminology, is important where dissemination and popularisation of scholarship in domestic languages are needed (Mathies et al 2020). Comparing with this latter paper, social sciences and Humanities (SSH) impacts are higher than seen here but lower than the other disciplines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the bibliometric understanding of scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct (Hall 2011). Supporting native languages in science, which may have specific research-related terminology, is important where dissemination and popularisation of scholarship in domestic languages are needed (Mathies et al 2020). Comparing with this latter paper, social sciences and Humanities (SSH) impacts are higher than seen here but lower than the other disciplines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Understanding publication patterns is important, not only to evaluate investments in scientifi c projects but also to see where investments are necessary to meet national objectives and priorities. There are marked differences between scientific disciplines and research fields, including their publishing practices and languages (Mathies et al 2020;McManus & Neves 2020). Many metrics associated with research publishing and impact significantly correlate to university reputation (Linton et al 2013), but these institutions rarely opinionate on where research is published, as this is largely left to the individual researcher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also remains to be seen how seriously institutions and academics take these alternative metrics and whether or not they would catalyse any substantial change, but there is a strong case for seeking broadly based academic change in the future, for example in the context of open science (Vicente-Saez et al, 2020) and particularly with respect to the fit between academic publication and the interests of the communities to which they relate (Gelmon et al, 2013;Mathies et al, 2020). Our own analysis must also be seen as what it is, based on 3 https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2020/ the experiences of just six academics and so limited in many respects.…”
Section: Limitations and Hegemonic Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OA scholarly publication benefits from the establishment of several grant funding both public and private mandates/agencies to finance the publication, almost always in the OA model (Lange, 2016;Ross-Hellauer et al, 2018;Mathies, Kivistö, & Birnbaum, 2019;Besir Demir, 2018;Gamsby, 2019). Some examples of these supports are Plan S (2020) and Horizon 2020, among many others.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%