Following the Flag: Troop Deployment and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment

Abstract

In contrast to the 19th and early 20th centuries, the effects of security factors on foreign direct investment (FDI) have received limited interest in the post-Cold War era. Using panel data for 126 developing countries between 1966 and 2002, and controlling for macroeconomic conditions, economic reforms, and level of democratization, this essay tests the effects of ''follow the flag'' variables on U.S. FDI. Security factors can affect FDI in two stages: the initial decision over whether to invest and the second stage, which involves the amount invested. Our results indicate a selection effect and that follow the flag factors are influential both in the selection phase and in the main equation for U.S. investors. However, such results are not found for global investors, suggesting that positive links between economic and security goals only hold for U.S. firms.

The effects of IMF programs on U.S. foreign direct investment in the developing world

“…19 Because the BEA suppresses country data for some years (e.g., when a single U.S. firm is the main investor in a country and thus the release of data would provide rival firms with useful information), we follow Rosecrance and Thompson (2003) and consider these data missing. 20 See Biglaiser and DeRouen (2007), Jensen (2003, Li (2006), and Li and Resnick (2003) that use similar control variables in their FDI work.…”

“…Although increased trade based on the growth of exports and imports is not a perfect proxy for trade reform, it is often used in the literature (Biglaiser and DeRouen 2007;Jensen 2003Jensen , 2006Li and Resnick 2003). We also test the KOF Globalization Index as a proxy for trade reform.…”

U.S. Troops and Foreign Economic Growth

“…Empirical support for this mechanism was recently provided by Biglaiser and DeRouen (2007), who also used Kane (2004) data and concluded, "[the] novel result is the positive effect of US troops in attracting US capital inflows." Interestingly, they found a higher FDI inflow from U.S. firms, but not other nations' firms.…”

State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy

“…Findlay & O'Rourke, 2007;Berger, et al, 2013); and firms respond to political factors in their trade and FDI decisions (e.g. Biglaiser & DeRouen, 2007;Li & Vashchilko, 2010). Recent financial crisis sweeping western world has in some ways made state ownership of enterprises less exceptional (Pargendler, 2012).…”