2020
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow‐up program for blood donors with unconfirmed screening results reveals a high false‐positive rate in Dalian, China

Abstract: BACKGROUND Chinese blood donors with unconfirmed serological and/or molecular screening results are deferred permanently. This study investigated the implementation and performance of a follow‐up program aiming to improve the notification and management of deferred donors in Dalian, China. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS From January 2013 to February 2018, 411,216 donations were tested for HBsAg, anti‐HCV, anti‐HIV/HIV antigen, and antibodies to Treponema pallidum. HBV, HCV, and HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, in Mexico, there are no policies oriented to blood donation education, which could encourage the open population to donate altruistically, thus increasing the collection of safe blood. Furthermore, there is a limitation regarding the false positive rate related to the screening technology used [ 9 , 26 , 27 ], which has been reported to be as high as 10.5% for HIV in the case of samples with an S/CO >1, but with low reactivity [ 28 ]. These facts reduce the number of positive-confirmed donors detected as reactive in serological screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in Mexico, there are no policies oriented to blood donation education, which could encourage the open population to donate altruistically, thus increasing the collection of safe blood. Furthermore, there is a limitation regarding the false positive rate related to the screening technology used [ 9 , 26 , 27 ], which has been reported to be as high as 10.5% for HIV in the case of samples with an S/CO >1, but with low reactivity [ 28 ]. These facts reduce the number of positive-confirmed donors detected as reactive in serological screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the specificities of such tests are lower than those of NATs and false positive results may be generated owing to crossreactivity between different antigens. [32][33][34] This situation could lead to the discarding of many blood bags, 35,36 the loss of eligible donors and deficiency in the supply of blood. 34 The low number of seronegative samples that were NAT+ detected in the present study (n = 16) is similar to other publications and can be attributed to the low specificity of the serological tests used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] This situation could lead to the discarding of many blood bags, 35,36 the loss of eligible donors and deficiency in the supply of blood. 34 The low number of seronegative samples that were NAT+ detected in the present study (n = 16) is similar to other publications and can be attributed to the low specificity of the serological tests used. [35][36][37][38][39] NAT is relevant for the early detection of viral antigens in the stages immediately following infection, while serological tests are important for detecting antigens and antibodies that may take a few days to appear in the blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood donors were pre‐qualified with an HBsAg rapid test (95% limit of detection [LoD]: 5 IU/ml). HBV, HCV and HIV infection status in blood donations collected from HBsAg nonreactive donors was determined according to the serological and molecular screening and confirmatory testing algorithms implemented in the Dalian Blood Center 16 . HBV DNA quantification was performed with an in‐house real‐time qPCR assay (95% LoD: 20 IU/ml) 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%