2023
DOI: 10.2196/52872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow-Up of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis in Specialist Health Care With Remote Monitoring and Self-Monitoring Compared With Regular Face-to-Face Follow-Up Visits (the ReMonit Study): Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled Open-Label Noninferiority Trial

Inger Jorid Berg,
Anne Therese Tveter,
Gunnstein Bakland
et al.

Abstract: Background Patients with chronic inflammatory joint diseases such as axial spondyloarthritis have traditionally received regular follow-up in specialist health care to maintain low disease activity. The follow-up has been organized as prescheduled face-to-face visits, which are time-consuming for both patients and health care professionals. Technology has enabled the remote monitoring of disease activity, allowing patients to self-monitor their disease and contact health care professionals when nee… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ongoing large randomized controlled trial TeleSpA [ 18 ] is solely based on questionnaires. The ongoing Remonit study [ 19 ] included point-of-care (POC) CRP tests for a subgroup of 12 patients additional to questionnaire-based ePROs. This POC device, QuikRead go [ 20 ], provides exact and fast CRP results, however was not designed for patient use and high costs prevent implementation in routine care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing large randomized controlled trial TeleSpA [ 18 ] is solely based on questionnaires. The ongoing Remonit study [ 19 ] included point-of-care (POC) CRP tests for a subgroup of 12 patients additional to questionnaire-based ePROs. This POC device, QuikRead go [ 20 ], provides exact and fast CRP results, however was not designed for patient use and high costs prevent implementation in routine care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%