2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03484-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow-up blood cultures add little value in the management of bacteremic urinary tract infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the result of previous studies, it was demonstrated that a high CRP level, and longer time to defervescence could be used as predictors of bacteremic urinary tract infection. [21,22] Our study showed that patients in the non-responder group were more likely to have bacteremia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the result of previous studies, it was demonstrated that a high CRP level, and longer time to defervescence could be used as predictors of bacteremic urinary tract infection. [21,22] Our study showed that patients in the non-responder group were more likely to have bacteremia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although the positive rate of detection from follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) is relatively low (5.8-10.9%) [1][2][3], and the risk factors for persistent GNB have not been investigated extensively, FUBCs have been routinely conducted in cases of GNB in many acute care hospitals [1][2][3][4]. Unnecessary routine blood cultures are invasive, and false positives due to contamination increase medical costs and time spent in hospitals [2,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the positive rate of detection from follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) is relatively low (5.8-10.9%) [1][2][3], and the risk factors for persistent GNB have not been investigated extensively, FUBCs have been routinely conducted in cases of GNB in many acute care hospitals [1][2][3][4]. Unnecessary routine blood cultures are invasive, and false positives due to contamination increase medical costs and time spent in hospitals [2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%