2015
DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2015.15.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma: Cytogenetics and pathological findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that HRD in cancer promotes genomic instability leading to chromosomal alterations. 42 In FDCS chromosomal alterations are often reported by classical karyotyping [21][22][23][24][25][26] and were found also by WGS in this study. This suggests that chromosomal "scarring" in FDCS may be a secondary pathogenic event, a consequence of HRD and further studies are warranted to specifically evaluate the correlation between HRD and chromosomal alterations in this setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that HRD in cancer promotes genomic instability leading to chromosomal alterations. 42 In FDCS chromosomal alterations are often reported by classical karyotyping [21][22][23][24][25][26] and were found also by WGS in this study. This suggests that chromosomal "scarring" in FDCS may be a secondary pathogenic event, a consequence of HRD and further studies are warranted to specifically evaluate the correlation between HRD and chromosomal alterations in this setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The karyotype of case #13 was complex, however, by comparison with previously publishes studies we could not identify analogy with previously reported SV. [21][22][23][24][25][26] In order to evaluate the impact of NGS findings in identifying recurrent translocations of diagnostic significance, variations occurring in regions of interest in cancer biology were explored by FISH probes on tissues slides of case #13. FISH probe for the 18q11.2 locus did not identify rearrangements reported on the same locus by WGS, t(16;18) (p11.2;q11.2) and t(18;22)(q11.2;q11.23), additionally, the CIC and 19q co-deletion probes confirmed the CNV gain detected by WGS but did not identify rearrangements (data not shown).…”
Section: Structural Variants and Copy Number Variations Detection In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neoplastic nature of FDCS was originally supported by identification of aberrant clonal karyotype and EBV clonality in the IPT-like variant 73 , 74 , and subsequently proven by the demonstration of chromosomal structural alterations, by classical karyotyping 75-78 , inversion probe array 79 and RNA, massive or targeted, parallel sequencing 80-82 . Notably, loss-type structural alterations were recorded as the most common event in FDCS (including loss of arms or of entire chromosomes) 75 , 77 , 78 , and often occur in regions encoding for important oncosuppressor genes 79 .…”
Section: Genetics and Molecular Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetics underlying follicular dendritic cell sarcoma are poorly understood. Cytogenetic findings across 7 abnormal cases recently reviewed by Udayakumar et al 9 included variable ploidy states (from hypodiploid to near-tetraploid) and mostly non-recurrent alterations, which may in part be due to technical challenges in obtaining sufficient, representative metaphase spreads from these tumor samples. On the molecular level, Go et al 10 identified the BRAF V600E mutation, a potentially drugtargetable gain-of-function mutation that is variably present in other histiocytic and dendritic cell tumors, in a subset of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma tumors (18.5%, n = 27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%