2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicle number, not assessments of the ovarian stroma, represents the best ultrasonographic marker of polycystic ovary syndrome

Abstract: Objective To compare the diagnostic potential of ultrasonographic markers of ovarian morphology, used alone or in combination, to predict PCOS. Design A diagnostic test study using cross-sectional data collected from 2006 to 2011. Setting Academic hospital and clinical research unit. Participants 82 women with PCOS and 60 healthy female volunteers. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Follicle number per ovary (FNPO), ovarian volume (OV), follicle number per single cross-section (FNPS), follicle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies do not find a greater discrimination using follicle number per ovary compared to follicle number in a single plane (20). Others demonstrate a similar AUC when comparing follicle number per ovary to a combination of follicle number in a single plane and the universally measured ovarian volume (19). In the context of our very large study, which started when follicle number in a single plane was the recommended measure to document polycystic ovary morphology, the simplicity and discriminatory power are sufficient to recommend the current measurements to define polycystic ovary morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies do not find a greater discrimination using follicle number per ovary compared to follicle number in a single plane (20). Others demonstrate a similar AUC when comparing follicle number per ovary to a combination of follicle number in a single plane and the universally measured ovarian volume (19). In the context of our very large study, which started when follicle number in a single plane was the recommended measure to document polycystic ovary morphology, the simplicity and discriminatory power are sufficient to recommend the current measurements to define polycystic ovary morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While it has been suggested that follicle number per ovary provides a more accurate assessment of polycystic ovary morphology (17, 19), the data are not as simple to obtain in large studies. Some studies do not find a greater discrimination using follicle number per ovary compared to follicle number in a single plane (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding that total mFG scores were neither predictive of, or related to, total testosterone levels is supported by some (24, 29, 44, 46) but not all studies (9, 47, 48). Differences in findings might relate to the inclusion of more severe manifestations of hirsutism in women with overt androgen excess disorders by some studies (12, 13, 45) as well as differences in the racial and ethnic groups investigated (1215).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…The largest single cross-sectional view of each ovary was evaluated by a single investigator for ovarian volume (OV), ovarian area (OA), stroma-to-total area ratio (S/A), and stromal index (SI) as previously described (29). In short, OA was calculated using the equation π/4 (transverse diameter) × (longitudinal diameter) and OV calculated based on the equation π/6 (transverse diameter) × (anteroposterior diameter) × (longitudinal diameter).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation