Folk Realism: Testing the Microfoundations of Realism in Ordinary Citizens1

Abstract

Kertzer, Joshua D. and Kathleen M. McGraw. (2012) Folk Realism: Testing the Microfoundations of Realism in Ordinary Citizens. International Studies Quarterly, doi: 10.1111/j.1468‐2478.2011.00715.x © 2012 International Studies Association International Relations scholars have long debated whether the American public is allergic to realism, which raises the question of how they would “contract” it in the first place. We argue that realism isn’t just an IR paradigm, but a belief system, whose relationship with other ideological systems in public opinion has rarely been fully examined. Operationalizing this disposition in ordinary citizens as “folk realism,” we investigate its relationship with a variety of personality traits, foreign policy orientations, and political knowledge. We then present the results of a laboratory experiment probing psychological microfoundations for realist theory, manipulating the amount of information subjects have about a foreign policy conflict to determine whether uncertainty leads individuals to adopt more realist views, and whether realists and idealists respond to uncertainty and fear differently. We find that many of realism’s causal mechanisms are conditional on whether subjects already hold realist views, and suggest that emotions like fear may play a larger role in realist theory than many realists have assumed.

Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics

“…Here, emotions serve as an important ideological component in decisions over material. Crawford (:550) highlights the importance of emotions in affecting material decisions that revolve around interests and positions: “[t]he perception and creation of interests is an emotional process as well as one rooted in a material reality or drive for power.” Kertzer and McGraw () make a similar point on the ideational/material distinction, demonstrating that fear plays a significant role in realist theory writ large , a paradigm traditionally dominated by materialist perspectives, as well as in the minds of ordinary individuals. Their model provides significant benefits as the literature includes emotional variables in a wide swath of areas of IR, from nuclear politics (2012), weapons taboos (Dolan ), sincerity assessment (Hall and Yarhi‐Milo ; Holmes ), and generalized trust (Rathbun ), to funding for homeland security (Mueller and Stewart ).…”

The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations

“…The first is a focus on the effects of actor heterogeneity among both elites and masses. In the next section we focus on a second major theme: the influence of psychological and behavioral factors on collective decision-making processes and the process of (Kertzer and McGraw 2012) aggregation. In both sections, the articles in this special issue provide examples of the new research program emerging in international relations.…”

Martial Law? Military Experience, International Law, and Support for Torture

“…More coherent individual preferences do not necessarily mean that mass opinion will be sensitive to legal appeals. Realpolitik tendencies may run deep in the public, reflected in sometimes lukewarm feelings toward international laws and institutions (Drezner ; Kertzer and McGraw )…”