2000
DOI: 10.1139/b00-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foliar plasticity of hybrid spruce in relation to crown position and stand age

Abstract: This study examined the foliar response of putative hybrid Engelmann × white × Sitka spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry × Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr) needles in relation to crown position and across three stages of development (15, 55, and 145 years). We focused on the morphological and anatomical response, and used physiological measures (photosynthesis and stomatal conductance) to emphasize the important relationship between structure and function. We found that needles from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species also differed significantly in the intracanopy plasticity of leaf mass (0.8-1.6), LA : SA (1.2-2.3), and SPI gcl (1.1-1.8); whether these differences scale up to species differences in whole canopy performance requires further study. Our findings are consistent with previous reports of invariance in guard cell length (Bongers and Popma, 1988;Carr, 2000;Richardson et al, 2000Richardson et al, , 2001 and of a maximum intracanopy plasticity in LMA of '1.5-2 times as reported for Populus tremula and Tilia cordata and for three species of conifers (Bond et al, 1999). The observed boundedness of intracanopy plasticity for all the traits, up to '2 times the maximum, implies a general convergence across species due to general optimization and/or to similar developmental constraints operating during primordia formation and leaf expansion, as discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species also differed significantly in the intracanopy plasticity of leaf mass (0.8-1.6), LA : SA (1.2-2.3), and SPI gcl (1.1-1.8); whether these differences scale up to species differences in whole canopy performance requires further study. Our findings are consistent with previous reports of invariance in guard cell length (Bongers and Popma, 1988;Carr, 2000;Richardson et al, 2000Richardson et al, , 2001 and of a maximum intracanopy plasticity in LMA of '1.5-2 times as reported for Populus tremula and Tilia cordata and for three species of conifers (Bond et al, 1999). The observed boundedness of intracanopy plasticity for all the traits, up to '2 times the maximum, implies a general convergence across species due to general optimization and/or to similar developmental constraints operating during primordia formation and leaf expansion, as discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The R 2 and slope are for values predicted by the model plotted against observed values; AIC ¼ Akaike information criterion, corrected for low N (values lowest by more than 2, in boldface type, indicate best-supported models). Kull, 1994;Richardson et al, 2000). It is possible that in those previous studies the particular species, conditions, or sampling protocols led to findings that did not represent the general patterns of intracanopy plasticity shown here for the six species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, observed a shift of carbon resources to different parts of the plant with ageing. Reductions in foliar efficiency, leaf size, and gas exchange attributes have been observed in trees of increasing age (Kull and Koppel 1987, Richardson et al 2000, Day et al 2001). Lower photosynthetic rates in older trees have been measured in various conifer species (see Bond 2000 for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose a smaller area for live fuel sampling because we wanted to limit potential differences in climate conditions over time across sites. Live foliage samples were collected within 2 m from the ground on the south side of each tree to minimize variation associated with crown position (Richardson et al 2000). All sampling occurred between 1200 and 1600 hours to limit variation caused by daily moisture fluctuations (Zahn and Henson 2011).…”
Section: Data Collection and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%