1970
DOI: 10.1002/prop.19700180402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foldy‐Wouthuysen Transformations and Related Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) as the initial and formal expression for the Hamiltonian in the FW representation in terms of the operators E and O. The transformed Hamiltonian was represented in precisely this form in [10,11,16,23].…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Obtained By Different Methods Of the Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) as the initial and formal expression for the Hamiltonian in the FW representation in terms of the operators E and O. The transformed Hamiltonian was represented in precisely this form in [10,11,16,23].…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Obtained By Different Methods Of the Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When A is time-independent and V = 0 , we obtain a (diagonalized) form similar to one derived in deVries 24 …”
Section: General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The improvement of the FW transformation [6] is the task of many authors from 1950 until today, see, e. g., the recent publications [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128]. Nevertheless, this transformation for free case of non-interacting spin 1/2 particle-antiparticle doublet is not changed from 1950 (the year of first publication) until today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first way is based on the application of the corresponding Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation directly to the canonical field equation (102). Note that there is a nonzero chance to find the appropriate transformation among a big number of so-called Foldy-Wouthuysen transformations for an arbitrary spin [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124]. Unfortunately for our approach, many authors considered for the spin s=1 case the 4-vector potential (see, e. g., [124]) and not 3-component wave function -3, 11, 12, 84, 89].…”
Section: The Example Of Covariant Field Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation