2019
DOI: 10.1144/sp487.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fold–thrust structures – where have all the buckles gone?

Abstract: The margins to evolving orogenic belts experience near layer-parallel contraction that can evolve into fold-thrust belts. Developing cross-section-scale understanding of these systems necessitates structural interpretation. However, over the past several decades a false distinction has arisen between some forms of so-called fault-related folding and buckle folding. We investigate the origins of this confusion and seek to develop unified approaches for interpreting fold-thrust belts that incorporate deformation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compare Fig; 10f and a), as is the case for detachment, or décollement, folding (e.g. Epard and Groshong, 1993;Schmalholz et al, 2002;Butler et al, 2019. During bulk shortening, the detachment fold is displaced across the basement towards the left. The HG is also closed after 47 % bulk shortening (Fig.…”
Section: -D Numerical Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…compare Fig; 10f and a), as is the case for detachment, or décollement, folding (e.g. Epard and Groshong, 1993;Schmalholz et al, 2002;Butler et al, 2019. During bulk shortening, the detachment fold is displaced across the basement towards the left. The HG is also closed after 47 % bulk shortening (Fig.…”
Section: -D Numerical Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Figure 10f and a), as is the case for detachment, or décollement, folding (e.g. Epard and Groshong Jr, 1993;Schmalholz et al, 2002;Butler et al, 2019). During bulk shortening, the detachment fold is displaced across the basement towards the left.…”
Section: D Numerical Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This décollement is likely in the Upper Cretaceous anhydrite‐bearing beds, in accordance with our observations in the core of the Yofuch syncline (Figure S6). We resolve the deeper portions of the anticlines through fish‐tail geometries, developed within multilayer detachment folds; this solution—marked with dashed lines in cross‐section B (Figure 14)—is conceptual, and more complex geometries are possible (e.g., Butler et al, 2019). The intervening synclines contain progressively more complete sections of the foreland‐basin strata toward the hinterland; the innermost syncline—its NE flank is depicted in cross‐section B (Figure 14)—hosts a complete foreland‐basin section up to the Polyzak Fm.…”
Section: Structural Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%