1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fold assembly of small proteins using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments

Abstract: The feasibility of predicting the global fold of small proteins by incorporating predicted secondary and tertiary restraints into ab initio folding simulations has been demonstrated on a test set comprised of 20 nonhomologous proteins, of which one was a blind prediction of target 42 in the recent CASP2 contest. These proteins contain from 37 to 100 residues and represent all secondary structural classes and a representative variety of global topologies. Secondary structure restraints are provided by the PHD s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the results are encouraging, with several structures predicted in the low-resolution range (14,15,18,19). However, such hybrid methods are still limited to small proteins because of their large computational requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again the results are encouraging, with several structures predicted in the low-resolution range (14,15,18,19). However, such hybrid methods are still limited to small proteins because of their large computational requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Secondary structure predictions have also been incorporated into ab initio structure prediction methods (14)(15)(16)(17). Again the results are encouraging, with several structures predicted in the low-resolution range (14,15,18,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A comparison of our method with some of the recent well-received computational methods of protein structure prediction (for example, Simons et al, 1998;Ortiz et al, 1998;Huang et al, 1999;Xia et al, 2000;Osguthorpe, 1999;Simons et al, 2001) shows it to be better or comparable (Table 2). Most of these methods use scoring or fitness functions to select the optimal solutions from a large number of conformations (decoys 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A principal razão é que estas leis ainda não são perfeitamente conhecidas, o que torna muito difícil obter conformações simultaneamente estáveis e funcionais a custo computacional razoável. Apesar dessas dificuldades, progressos na predição da estrutura tridimensional de peptídeos e pequenas proteínas por métodos ab initio têm sido relatados recentemente [12][13][14][15][16][17] . A ferramenta mais bem sucedida de predição de estruturas tridimensionais de proteínas é a modelagem por homologia, também conhecida como modelagem comparativa ("comparative protein modeling") [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…É possível, em princípio, predizer a estrutura tridimensional de proteínas a partir de sua estrutura primária. Este método é conhecido como modelagem de proteínas ab initio [12][13][14][15][16][17] . A determinação da estrutura secundária de proteínas por este método é um sério desafio, sendo hoje o maior problema não resolvido da biologia molecular estrutural 18 .…”
unclassified