Fog collection on a superhydrophobic/hydrophilic composite spine surface

Abstract

Inspired by numerous plants and animals living in arid conditions, a composite surface with the fog collection capacity has been fabricated in this study. The surface is composed of polydimethylsiloxanebased spine-arrays and a ZnO micron structure. Two wetting properties are integrated on the surface of the spine structure; the tip of spine is processed as hydrophilic and other parts such as the root region of spine and the base are processed as superhydrophobic. When the surface is in the saturated fog flow with a specific tilt angle, the fog deposits on spines and forms condensed droplets; then, the droplets fall off the surface due to gravity. Further, a new cycle of fog collection begins. In this study, we find that the percentage of the hydrophilic tip in the overall spine structure length, the distance between two spines and the tilt angle of surface are the key factors for improving the efficiency of fog collection. Such a composite surface might be an ideal platform for fog collection from air. rsc.li/rsc-advances9318 | RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 9318-9323This journal is

Effect of Droplet-Removal Processes on Fog-Harvesting Performance on Wettability-Controlled Wire Array with Staggered Arrangement

“…Because droplets attached to a harvester are unusable for other purposes, these droplets should be transferred and stored in a reserve tank; thus, mechanisms to initiate droplet transfer serve an important role. The use of a wettability gradient and Laplace pressure difference in the droplet have attracted significant attention. , These processes are inspired by insects, , , plants, , and animals and are emulated using several complicated fabrication techniques. − For example, Ju et al fabricated a conical copper wire by electrochemical corrosion and then modified the wettability to be hydrophobic at its tip and hydrophilic at its root. Because both gradient characteristics contribute to driving droplets from the tip to the root, efficient droplet transfer was achieved.…”

Bioinspired Integrative Surface with Hierarchical Texture and Wettable Gradient-Driven Water Collection

“…The difference in the wettability of the material surface affects the surface’s fog collection efficiency. − According to Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter model, in order to produce different wettability on the surface of the same material, the morphology of the structure, the chemical composition of the surface, or both need to be changed. The surface chemical composition determines whether a surface is hydrophobic or hydrophilic, and its morphology usually determines the degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity. , Take a more basic example, such as the superhydrophobic phenomenon on the surface of the lotus leaf, which combines the surface micro–nano structure and the low surface energy coating. − Conversely, superhydrophilic surfaces have high surface energy.…”