FOG-3/Tob can either promote or inhibit proliferation in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline

Snow, Josh J.; Lee, Myon‐Hee; Kroll-Conner, Peggy; Kimble, Judith

doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.382

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Subjects can be asked for their input about revising the procedure in order to learn more about the problem being studied" (Goodwin, 1995, p. 42). Milgram (1963), viewed one purpose of the debriefing to be the gathering of more data about his subjects. The other purpose is methodological: to allow the subject to inform the experimenter of their impressions after having participated so that the experimenter can learn about and resolve any issues (e.g., the deception did not work, the subject was confused about his/her role).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, McGuire's 1960 report on a deception experiment states participants were subjected to a "postexperimental 'catharsis' session" (Harris, 1988, p. 194). In the wake of Milgram's (1963) controversial obedience experiments, critics called his research unethical because it caused many participants very high levels of distress (Baumrind, 1964). According to Harris, Milgram's experiments were the springboard to psychology embracing the ethical need for debriefing, as Milgram's defense for his research was that each subject had a "friendly reconciliation" (as cited in Harris, 1988, p. 196) with the confederate (i.e., revealing deception) and during those sessions subjects reported no lasting harm (i.e., restorative purpose of debriefing).…”

Section: Historical Studies Of Debriefingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This report mandated that all proposed research with human participants must first pass through a risk analysis by an Institutional Review Board Historians have, however, offered yet other explanations for the establishment of ethics codes for psychology research. Some (Harris, 1988;Stark, 2010) point to Milgram's (1963) obedience experiments as a precipitating cause for alarm that led to discussion and formation of an ethics code by the APA. Milgram's controversial experiments involved deception and high levels of stress for many subjects, leading some psychologists (Baumrind, 1964) to call these experiments unethical.…”

Section: Apa Ethical Principles Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Debriefing in Psychology Research: Evidence of a Malleable Ethics Principle

Neaton¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This thesis would not have been possible without the hard work and support of those close to me. I have enormous gratitude for those individuals who have helped me along the way. I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Jill Morawski, for providing invaluable guidance over the past two years. Her knowledge, dedication, hard work, and kindness made this thesis possible. I appreciate the hours and hours of her time that were spent with this thesis and me. Without her expert direction and infectious vitality this thesis simply could not have happened. I cannot thank her enough for all that she has done. In addition, I would like to thank my lab mates, Kristen Lynch and Rachel Pradilla for all their hard work and assistance with this project. Their insights and productivity were invaluable to the success of this research, and I appreciate their openness and commitment to this project. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude for my family and friends at Wesleyan who gave me their support during this journey. I could not have completed this thesis without those of you on the outside helping me to the finish line. Thank you.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Historical Studies Of Debriefingmentioning

confidence: 99%