2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FoDoSu: Multi-document summarization exploiting semantic analysis based on social Folksonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the study aims and questions raised earlier, the authors employed the main source of qualitative data through interviews. Interview data are one of the important sources of data (Heu et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Silverman, 1999). Silverman (1999) argued that words are important simply as a jumping-off point for the real analysis; he suggested that where texts are analysed, they usually are presented as 'official' or 'common sense' versions of social phenomena.…”
Section: The Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the study aims and questions raised earlier, the authors employed the main source of qualitative data through interviews. Interview data are one of the important sources of data (Heu et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Silverman, 1999). Silverman (1999) argued that words are important simply as a jumping-off point for the real analysis; he suggested that where texts are analysed, they usually are presented as 'official' or 'common sense' versions of social phenomena.…”
Section: The Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [36] the author describes an application in which word clouds are used to browse and synthesize Twitter results with the aim of showing a first opinion of the contents of the tweets. In [31] the authors propose a new multi-document summarization system called FoDoSu (Folksonomy-based Multi-Document Summarization) based on social folksonomies. The word frequency table is created for semantic analysis and the relevance of words is measured using HITS algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is further narrated that various techniques have been utilized in this regard, including machine learning, deep learning, text and data mining, etc. It is concluded that machinelearning approaches are better in terms of classification accuracy and robustness [24][25][26].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%