Fodder Resource Management in India- A Critical Analysis

Earagariyanna, Mutturaj Yadav; Venkayala, Jagadeeswary; Kammardi, Satyanarayan; Sriramaiah, Mohankumar

doi:10.5455/ijlr.20170513095912

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) was calculated by multiplying the residue concentration (mg/kg) of CAP in paddy leaf obtained under field conditions with the average per capita consumption rate of green fodder (kg animal −1 day −1 ), divided by the average bodyweight of the animal. The average per capita consumption rate of green fodder in dry and In-milk cattle was 3.40 and 4.75 kg animal −1 day −1 as per the NATP project database and the average body weight of dry and In-milk cattle is 245 and 280 kg, respectively 33 . According to the procedure given by the World Health Organization (WHO, Geneva), Hazard Index (HI) was estimated by dividing EDI (mg kg −1 day −1 ) by their relevant values of Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) expressed as mg kg −1 body weight (bw) day −1 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC in the paddy ecosystem and its risk assessment

Mahato

Naik

Bheemanna

et al. 2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chlorantraniliprole belongsto theanthranilic diamide group is widely used against broad range of lepidopteron pests in a variety of vegetable and rice pests includingyellow rice stem borer and leaf folder. Supervised field trials were conducted duringRabi (2018–2019) and Kharif (2019) to evaluate the dissipation pattern and risk assessment of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC in paddy ecosystem following foliar application at 30 and 60 g a.i. ha-1 in two different cropping seasons.Modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) technique was used for the extraction of CAP residues with acetonitrile and determined by LC–MS/MS (ESI +).The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.01 µg g−1 for paddy leaf, straw, husk, and brown rice, respectively and 0.005 µg g−1 for soil. The average recoveries obtained were 84.30–88.92% from paddy leaf, 94.25–97.81% from straw, 90.21–93.38% from husk, 93.57–96.40% from brown rice and 89.93–91.14% from soil. The residues in paddy leaf dissipated within 35–40 days with a half-life of 4.33–5.07 days in Rabi and 3.92–4.86 days in Kharif at 30 and 60 g a.i. ha−1, respectively. The residues in soil dissipated within 15–21 days with a half-life of 14.44–15.75 days in Rabi and 13.33–14.44 days in Kharif at respective doses. At harvest chlorantraniliprole residues were not detected in straw, husk, and brown rice. The dietary risk of paddy leaf (green fodder) for cattle was found safe for consumption as the hazard index is less than one. Soil ecological risk assessment was found to be less than one (RQ < 0.1) for earthworms (Eisenia foetida) and arthropods (Aphidiusrhopalosiphi). The presentmethod could be useful inthe analysis ofchlorantraniliproleresidues in different cereals and vegetable crop ecosystems and application at recommended dose is safe for the final produce at harvest.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC in the paddy ecosystem and its risk assessment

Mahato

Naik

Bheemanna

et al. 2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the larger portion of land is modeled for the production of food and cash crops and an insufficient portion of arable land is available for fodder production. Indian livestock requires 883.95 Mt of green fodder and 583.66 Mt dry matter of fodder; however, present production is 664.73 Mt of green fodder and 355.93 Mt of dry fodder (million tonnes) [26]. Thus, to cover the demand-supply gap, high-quality fodder production enriched with nutrients is mandatory.…”

Section: Malnutrition In Animalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biofortification—A Frontier Novel Approach to Enrich Micronutrients in Field Crops to Encounter the Nutritional Security

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globally, many developing countries are facing silent epidemics of nutritional deficiencies in human beings and animals. The lack of diversity in diet, i.e., cereal-based crops deficient in mineral nutrients is an additional threat to nutritional quality. The present review accounts for the significance of biofortification as a process to enhance the productivity of crops and also an agricultural solution to address the issues of nutritional security. In this endeavor, different innovative and specific biofortification approaches have been discussed for nutrient enrichment of field crops including cereals, pulses, oilseeds and fodder crops. The agronomic approach increases the micronutrient density in crops with soil and foliar application of fertilizers including amendments. The biofortification through conventional breeding approach includes the selection of efficient genotypes, practicing crossing of plants with desirable nutritional traits without sacrificing agricultural and economic productivity. However, the transgenic/biotechnological approach involves the synthesis of transgenes for micronutrient re-translocation between tissues to enhance their bioavailability. Soil microorganisms enhance nutrient content in the rhizosphere through diverse mechanisms such as synthesis, mobilization, transformations and siderophore production which accumulate more minerals in plants. Different sources of micronutrients viz. mineral solutions, chelates and nanoparticles play a pivotal role in the process of biofortification as it regulates the absorption rates and mechanisms in plants. Apart from the quality parameters, biofortification also improved the crop yield to alleviate hidden hunger thus proving to be a sustainable and cost-effective approach. Thus, this review article conveys a message for researchers about the adequate potential of biofortification to increase crop productivity and nourish the crop with additional nutrient content to provide food security and nutritional quality to humans and livestock.

show abstract

“…A major constraint of livestock production in India is the scarcity and fluctuating quantity and quality of the year-round fodder supply. At present, the country faces a net deficit of 61.1% green fodder, 21.9% dry crop residues and 64% concentrate feeds (Earagariyanna et al, 2017) and this deficit is major cause of low productivity of livestock. One way to reduce such problem is to replace the fodder with non-forage fibrous sources such as sugar beet pulp.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%