2008
DOI: 10.1118/1.2924220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focused beam‐stop array for the measurement of scatter in megavoltage portal and cone beam CT imaging

Abstract: We describe a focused beam-stop array (BSA) for the measurement of object scatter in imaging systems that utilize x-ray beams in the megavoltage (MV) energy range. The BSA consists of 64 doubly truncated tungsten cone elements of 0.5 cm maximum diameter that are arranged in a regular array on an acrylic slab. The BSA is placed in the accessory tray of a medical linear accelerator at a distance of approximately 50 cm from the focal spot. We derive an expression that allows us to estimate the scatter in an image… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been proposed for estimating scatter in raw projection data. These include scatter deconvolution 5,6 , scatter modeling 7 , modulators 8,9 , beam stop arrays 10 , two scans 11 and a detector shadowing technique 12 . The scatter deconvolution method, also known as scatter kernel superposition (SKS) has the advantages of not requiring extra hardware, preserving the entire field-of-view, and being computationally efficient, but has not proven to be as accurate as some of the other techniques.…”
Section: Scatter Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed for estimating scatter in raw projection data. These include scatter deconvolution 5,6 , scatter modeling 7 , modulators 8,9 , beam stop arrays 10 , two scans 11 and a detector shadowing technique 12 . The scatter deconvolution method, also known as scatter kernel superposition (SKS) has the advantages of not requiring extra hardware, preserving the entire field-of-view, and being computationally efficient, but has not proven to be as accurate as some of the other techniques.…”
Section: Scatter Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement-based methods typically insert sparse x-ray beam blockers (e.g., lead) between the x-ray source and the object, and obtain scatter samples inside the resultant shadows on the detector. 8,[20][21][22][23] The scatter distribution of the whole-field is then accurately estimated using interpolation/extrapolation on the sampled scatter data since scatter distributions have dominant lowfrequency components. 8,24 These methods are simple and efficient, and achieve effective scatter correction without prior knowledge of the imaged object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, methods of direct scatter measurement conveniently obtain accurate scatter estimates with negligible computational cost [17]. In the measurement-based method, a beam blocker is typically inserted between the X-ray source and the object, and scatter signals are estimated inside the detector shadows of the beam blocker [15, 2931], where primary signals are fully attenuated. The scatter distribution of the whole field is then obtained via interpolation/extrapolation on the scatter samples inside the shadows, since scatter distributions have dominant low-frequency components [15, 32, 33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%