2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-006-9134-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus on Words: A Twin Study of Reading and Inattention

Abstract: The etiology of variation in reading ability and its relationship to inattention, impulsivity, and general cognitive ability were investigated within a large, population-based sample of 9- to 10-year-old twins. Phenotypic and genetic analyses were performed on word-level reading, full-scale IQ, and measures of inattention and impulsivity derived from the Go-NoGo task (i.e., Go errors and NoGo errors, respectively). Moderate and significant phenotypic correlations were found among reading, inattention and IQ, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible that any shared genetic variability between inattention symptoms and reading disability could reflect a common genetic association shared with general intelligence. This idea was supported by evidence that genetic and environmental influences shared with IQ accounted for the covariance between reading performance and a cognitive attention measure (Zumberge et al 2007 ). However, it is not possible to generalize directly from cognitive attention processes to behavioural inattention problems (Marzocchi et al 2009 ; Warner-Rogers et al 2000 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, it is possible that any shared genetic variability between inattention symptoms and reading disability could reflect a common genetic association shared with general intelligence. This idea was supported by evidence that genetic and environmental influences shared with IQ accounted for the covariance between reading performance and a cognitive attention measure (Zumberge et al 2007 ). However, it is not possible to generalize directly from cognitive attention processes to behavioural inattention problems (Marzocchi et al 2009 ; Warner-Rogers et al 2000 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most twin studies of reading suggest minimal contribution of shared environmental factors. For example, the previously mentioned twin studies by Harlaar et al (Harlaar, et al, 2007), Gayán and Olsen (Gayan & Olson, 2003) and, Zurnberge et al (Zurnberge, et al, 2007) all concluded that shared environmental factors accounted for 10% or less of the phenotypic variance in reading. Nonetheless, the estimation of shared environmental effects in a twin study is indirect (i.e., based on a comparison of monozygotic and dizygotic twin similarity), and estimates might differ when more direct approaches, such as an adoption study, are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a sample of 440 twins age 8 to 18, Gayán and Olsen (Gayan & Olson, 2003) reported heritability estimates of 80% or higher for 4 different measures of reading performance (e.g., word recognition, phonological decoding). Finally, in a community based sample of 605 pairs of twins age 10 years, Zurnberge et al (Zurnberge, Baker, & Manis, 2007) reported a heritability estimate of 70% for reading as assessed by subtests from the Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement. Importantly, not only are reading disability and reading abilities substantially heritable, but the influence of genetic risk factors for reading disability appears to be of comparable magnitude to those that contribute to individual differences in reading-related phenotypes throughout the normal range (Bates, et al, 2007; Hawke, Wadsworth, Olson, & DeFries, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors have proposed a reciprocal causal relation between behavior problems and reading (i.e., difficulties in one domain exacerbate problems in the other; see Spira & Fischel, 2005 for review), recent genetic research has pointed to possible underlying mechanisms that simultaneously influence both domains (Cornish, Savage, Hocking, & Hollis, 2011; Hart, et al, 2010). Research with older children has shown that it is most likely the inattention, rather than the hyperactivity, component that accounts for the relation between ADHD and reading (e.g., Zumberge, Baker, & Manis, 2007). Whereas the link between inattention and reading is well documented in older children, less is known about the relations between inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behaviors and reading-related skills when they first emerge in the preschool years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%