2020
DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1811685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus on a rare clinical entity: unicuspid aortic valve disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the earlier presentation and increased likelihood of more severe stenosis, unicuspid aortic valves manifest with an increased incidence of ascending aorta dilatation, 7 and aortic complications than the bicuspid and quadricuspid aortic valves. 2,25 In accordance with the literature, aortic dilatation was present in the patient with the unicuspid aortic valve, while aortic measurements were normal in the patient with the quadricuspid aortic valve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the earlier presentation and increased likelihood of more severe stenosis, unicuspid aortic valves manifest with an increased incidence of ascending aorta dilatation, 7 and aortic complications than the bicuspid and quadricuspid aortic valves. 2,25 In accordance with the literature, aortic dilatation was present in the patient with the unicuspid aortic valve, while aortic measurements were normal in the patient with the quadricuspid aortic valve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Adopting the current recommendations of the bicuspid aortic valve guideline for E. Aslan these patients would be appropriate in the close management and monitoring of both aortic valve and aortic complications. 25 While evaluating these patients, it is necessary to clearly demonstrate the coronary arteries, especially for patients who will undergo surgery, as well as other possible intracardiac pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the prevalence, age at presentation and prognosis of unicuspid and BAV, are not equivalent ( 13 , 14 ). Furthermore, the anatomic definition of unicuspid aortic valve (one cusp with or without a commissure: unicommissural or acommissural) ( 15 , 16 ) is very different from that of BAV (two cusps, two commissures); therefore, the Sievers classification includes only one (unicommissural) of the two types of unicuspid aortic valves as if it were a subtype of BAV, which is not correct.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Sievers Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In addition, the prevalence, age at presentation and prognosis of unicuspid and BAV are not equivalent. 22,23 Furthermore, the definition of unicuspid aortic valve (1 cusp with or without a commissure: unicommissural or acommissural) 24,25 is very different from that of BAV (2 cusps, 2 commissures); therefore, the Sievers classification includes only 1 (unicommissural) of the 2 types of unicuspid aortic valves as if it were a subtype of BAV, which is confusing. The use of one or another of the many classifications for research varies according to authors and institutions, and there are specific terminologies that lead to confusion such as the "true" BAV 2 ; does it mean that the others are false BAV?…”
Section: Why Have a Standard Nomenclature And Classification Consensu...mentioning
confidence: 99%