1993
DOI: 10.1080/07377366.1993.10400881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus Groups: An Effective Tool for Continuing Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used focus group interviews to gather students' perceptions of the course. Focus groups have been used effectively for programme evaluation in higher education 10 , 11 and are particularly useful in obtaining information about the student's perspective. 12…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used focus group interviews to gather students' perceptions of the course. Focus groups have been used effectively for programme evaluation in higher education 10 , 11 and are particularly useful in obtaining information about the student's perspective. 12…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus groups were used to assess student perceptions of effective small group teaching in the Basis of Medicine . Focus groups have been used effectively for programme evaluation in higher education 11,12 and for curriculum planning and evaluation in medicine 13–16 . This technique is considered to be an inexpensive method of gathering qualitative data 17 and is well suited to obtaining such information from the consumer's point of view 13 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We gathered our data in focus group discussions because these interactions are known to help to capturing youth experiences more effectively than structured survey research (see, for example, Berg, 1995). Further, over time it has been shown that focus group discussion generates data that are extremely rich and of high quality (Ashar & Lane, 1991), and that this method has a unique ability to generate data based on the synergy and the stimulation of the group interaction (Hess, 1968;Catterall & Maclaran, 1997) because group members influence each other by responding to ideas and comments in the discussion (Barnet, 2002;Glitz, 1998;Krueger & Casey, 2000).…”
Section: Field Population Of the Study And Selection Of Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%