1981
DOI: 10.1086/112907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FOCAS - Faint Object Classification and Analysis System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
145
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Object detection, photometry and morphological classification was carried out with FOCAS (Valdes 1994;Jarvis & Tyson 1981). The reliability of the detection process was extensively tested on simulated images generated with the iraf-package noao.artdata.…”
Section: Object Detection and Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object detection, photometry and morphological classification was carried out with FOCAS (Valdes 1994;Jarvis & Tyson 1981). The reliability of the detection process was extensively tested on simulated images generated with the iraf-package noao.artdata.…”
Section: Object Detection and Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is basic science as usual. Such computational processing has its levels of accuracy and precision; and its reliability is de facto determined by values such as ease of implementation, cost, and running time, as well as the available hardware (Jarvis & Tyson 1981). Usually, nothing significant hinges on such routine identification of astronomical objects.…”
Section: Scientific Theories -Acceptance Versus Beliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object detection was carried out using FOCAS (Jarvis and Tyson 1981) with a detection threshold of 2.5σ of the sky fluctuations per pixel. A minimum of ∼ (F W HM) 2 connecting pixels above the threshold was required for detection.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%