2023
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-2422
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal-TSMP: Deep learning for vegetation health prediction and agricultural drought assessment from a regional climate simulation

Mohamad Hakam Shams Eddin,
Juergen Gall

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, we investigate applying deep learning (DL) models on a regional climate simulation produced by the Terrestrial Systems Modelling Platform (TSMP Ground to Atmosphere G2A) for vegetation health modeling and agricultural drought assessment. The TSMP simulation is performed in a free mode and the DL model is used in an intermediate step to synthesize Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Brightness Temperature (BT) images from the TSMP simulation over Europe. These predicted im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, others showed a different perspective of trends related to terrestrial vegetation from remote sensing products (Zhu et al, 2016;Kogan et al, 2020). This is usually explained as assessments are highly dependent on drought definition (Satoh et al, 2021;Reyniers et al, 2023) and extreme event attribution (Van Oldenborgh et al, 2021), i.e., the drought indicator that was chosen in the methodology and the variations in modeling platforms. In addition, prescribed vegetation assumptions exist in climate simulations which limit the modeling of atmospheric carbon effects or soil moisture deficiency on vegetation (Pirret et al, 2020;Pokhrel et al, 2021;Reyniers et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, others showed a different perspective of trends related to terrestrial vegetation from remote sensing products (Zhu et al, 2016;Kogan et al, 2020). This is usually explained as assessments are highly dependent on drought definition (Satoh et al, 2021;Reyniers et al, 2023) and extreme event attribution (Van Oldenborgh et al, 2021), i.e., the drought indicator that was chosen in the methodology and the variations in modeling platforms. In addition, prescribed vegetation assumptions exist in climate simulations which limit the modeling of atmospheric carbon effects or soil moisture deficiency on vegetation (Pirret et al, 2020;Pokhrel et al, 2021;Reyniers et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, prescribed vegetation assumptions exist in climate simulations which limit the modeling of atmospheric carbon effects or soil moisture deficiency on vegetation (Pirret et al, 2020;Pokhrel et al, 2021;Reyniers et al, 2023). If we add to this the complex spatiotemporal response of vegetation to climate variability (Seneviratne et al, 2021;Jin et al, 2023), i.e., regional responses to climate have different dynamics and are more complicated than those on a global scale, we can conclude that predicting the vegetation state in response to drought under climate conditions still poses a major challenge. More precisely, in this study we predict satellite-based vegetation products from a free, evolving simulation based on the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TSMP) (Furusho-Percot et al, 2019a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%