2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3194522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal Frame Loss: A Simple but Effective Loss for Precipitation Nowcasting

Abstract: Precipitation nowcasting is an important but hard problem. Currently, with the landing of deep learning, it has been treated as an image prediction problem based on radar echo maps. However, deep learning models suffer from poor performance and blurred prediction results. Lots of improvement works enhance the model by adding complex modules, which increases insufferable training memory and time overhead. Others tempt to add more limitations or guidances on loss, but they usually have little effect in such an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, dealing with extensive meteorological data computationally demands significant resources, resulting in low computational efficiency and poor real-time performance. Lastly, physical models have a limited utilization rate of historical meteorological data, making it challenging to integrate existing meteorological data for precipitation prediction [16,17]. Currently, mainstream methods based on radar echo reflectivity extrapolation include the cross-correlation method (TREC) [18], the optical flow method [19], the monomer centroid method [18], and deep learning-based radar echo extrapolation methods [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, dealing with extensive meteorological data computationally demands significant resources, resulting in low computational efficiency and poor real-time performance. Lastly, physical models have a limited utilization rate of historical meteorological data, making it challenging to integrate existing meteorological data for precipitation prediction [16,17]. Currently, mainstream methods based on radar echo reflectivity extrapolation include the cross-correlation method (TREC) [18], the optical flow method [19], the monomer centroid method [18], and deep learning-based radar echo extrapolation methods [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation-based systems are often impacted by initial condition fields and require a period of integration to initiate deduction processes. This limitation leads to poor precipitation predictions at zero to two hours lead time [12], [13]. Moreover, such systems are computationally expensive and are unable to provide small-scale forecasting [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional rainfall forecasting methods, also known as numerical weather prediction (NWP) [11], are based on hydrodynamic and thermodynamic equations describing complex atmospheric motions and predicting future atmospheric states. However, NWP is usually very sensitive to perturbations in initial and boundary conditions, which leads to the inability to provide accurate 0-2 hours precipitation forecasts [12]. In addition, the computational cost of NWP is high and time-consuming to solve even on modern supercomputers [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%