2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-006-0106-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal breast lesions with benign appearances. Review of eight breast cancers with initial features of intramammary lymph node

Abstract: Although uncommon, a lesion with the radiographic features of an intramammary lymph node may hide an early breast cancer. No significant relationship exists between histological type and the presence of such features.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, three carcinomas classifi ed as BI-RADS 3 (one mucinous, one tubular and one invasive ductal) had a benign US elastography score, at least in part as a result of histological features such as high mucin content, or a size >2 cm that can lead to lesion heterogeneity due the presence of necrotic-colliquative areas, as demonstrated by Giuseppetti et al [6]. In this regard, it would seem appropriate to periodically follow-up BI-RADS 3 lesions not subjected to biopsy in order to assess their stability over time and thus lower the risk of missing the opportunity of early diagnosis of a possible malignancy [19]. In contrast, the PPV of US elastography in BI-RADS 4 focal breast lesions -64.7% in our experience -is not suffi ciently high to the need for biopsy on the basis of the US elastography score alone, as suggested by a previous report on nonpalpable breast lesions [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, three carcinomas classifi ed as BI-RADS 3 (one mucinous, one tubular and one invasive ductal) had a benign US elastography score, at least in part as a result of histological features such as high mucin content, or a size >2 cm that can lead to lesion heterogeneity due the presence of necrotic-colliquative areas, as demonstrated by Giuseppetti et al [6]. In this regard, it would seem appropriate to periodically follow-up BI-RADS 3 lesions not subjected to biopsy in order to assess their stability over time and thus lower the risk of missing the opportunity of early diagnosis of a possible malignancy [19]. In contrast, the PPV of US elastography in BI-RADS 4 focal breast lesions -64.7% in our experience -is not suffi ciently high to the need for biopsy on the basis of the US elastography score alone, as suggested by a previous report on nonpalpable breast lesions [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tempo e, quindi, di ridurre la possibilità di non diagnosticare tempestivamente una eventuale lesione maligna[19]. Di contro, il VPP riportato dall'elastosonografi a nell'analisi delle lesioni focali mammarie BI-RADS 4, pari nella nostra esperienza al 64,7%, non risulta abbastanza soddisfacente da consentire di escludere il ricorso alla biopsia sulla scorta del solo punteggio elastosonografi co, in accordo con quanto suggerito da un precedente studio condotto su lesioni mammarie non palpabili[12].…”
unclassified