2007
DOI: 10.1021/bp070032r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foam and Its Mitigation in Fermentation Systems

Abstract: Key aspects of foaming and its mitigation in fermentation systems are presented. Foam properties and behavior, conditions that affect foaming, and consequences of foaming are discussed, followed by methods to detect and prevent foam, both without and with the use of antifoam, and their implications. Antifoams were catalogued according to their class (e.g., polyalkylene glycols, silicone emulsions, etc.) to facilitate recognition of antifoams possessing similar base compositions. Relatively few published studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It had been reported that hydrophobic cells could concentrate at the gas/liquid interface and stabilize the foams [25]. In our previous study, the relative hydrophobicity of various bacterial cells was measured by the partitioning of cells to the water-hexadecane interface [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It had been reported that hydrophobic cells could concentrate at the gas/liquid interface and stabilize the foams [25]. In our previous study, the relative hydrophobicity of various bacterial cells was measured by the partitioning of cells to the water-hexadecane interface [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean oil content is expected to affect foaming. It is common to use oils to decrease the foam formation in fermentation processes [25,26]. According to Rols and Goma, the oils would increase the gas bubble size and make the foam less stable [27].…”
Section: Effects Of Soybean Oil Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foam stabilization due to presence of hydrophobic particles such as Norcadia cell solids has also been reported (Jenkins et al, 1993). Several foam mitigation strategies have been reported in literature and are clearly applicable to improve the productivity of our process, which we envision pursuing in the future (Junker, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] These factors include solution properties such as medium composition, cell density, cell viability, cell growth, and titer, in addition to bioreactor operating conditions such as gas flow rate, sparger orifice size, agitation rate, temperature, and vessel geometry. 3 While some foam can be tolerated, excessive foam accumulation can significantly lower operational efficiency and overall protein production. Uncontrolled foam proliferation has the potential to reduce the maximum working volume of culture, 1,3 deposit medium components and/or product on non-wetted surfaces, 3 hinder gas mass transfer, 1,3,5 and clog vent filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Surface-active antifoam globules enter foam films and cause film rupture via several possible mechanisms detailed elsewhere. 3,6 Raw material suppliers offer various types of water-dilutable, emulsion-based antifoams. 3 In biopharmaceutical processes, it is important to consider cost, usage requirements, antifoam efficiency, solubility in cell culture fluid, chemical properties, toxicity, mass transfer effects, downstream clearance, assay compatibility or interference (e.g., with pH or dissolved oxygen (DO) sensors), and sterilization options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%