2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12193-020-00325-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fNIRS-based classification of mind-wandering with personalized window selection for multimodal learning interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this has to be compromised with potential fatigue, which was reported by the participants as minimal because the task execution in this experiment lasted for about 25 min on average (std = 2.32 min). Besides, longer trials would enable the application of the sliding window technique, which was found to improve accuracy in detecting a mental state (mind-wandering) (Liu et al, 2020). Repeating the experiment with similar protocol to this study can also allow the comparison of classification methods.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, this has to be compromised with potential fatigue, which was reported by the participants as minimal because the task execution in this experiment lasted for about 25 min on average (std = 2.32 min). Besides, longer trials would enable the application of the sliding window technique, which was found to improve accuracy in detecting a mental state (mind-wandering) (Liu et al, 2020). Repeating the experiment with similar protocol to this study can also allow the comparison of classification methods.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There are relatively few research efforts focused on assessing mind wandering using fNIRS signals. One study investigated different ML and deep learning classifiers such as deep neural networks (DNNs), convolution neural networks (CNNs), and XGBoost to identify different mind wandering levels without interrupting the incoming task [52].…”
Section: Fnirs and Mind Wanderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are relatively few research efforts focused on assessing mind wandering using fNIRS signals. One study investigated different ML and deep learning classifiers such as deep neural networks (DNNs), convolution neural networks (CNNs), and XGBoost to identify different mind wandering levels without interrupting the incoming task [52]. Another study analyzed the participants’ mind wandering levels by exploring when the participants leave the primary task in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) [53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, researchers have shown the need for building group models (across participants) for fNIRS data classification [48,49], which can enable researchers to get a larger dataset for model training and achieve more reliable results, as well as reduce the time for collecting brain data from a particular individual. However, due to inter-subject variability in hemodynamic responses, it is difficult to build robust models across participants based on fNIRS data [50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Individual Vs Group Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%