1970
DOI: 10.2113/gssgfbull.s7-xii.4.664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flysch et molasse, approche sedimentologique

Abstract: Examples from France and Italy of both rock types, differences in characteristics, evolution of basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sedimentological characteristics of molasse are distinctive (Beaudoin et al 1970), but such facies are not found exclusively in molasse sequences. Thus, clastic wedges in cratonic settings may be stratigraphicaliy and sedimentologically identical to molasse, and a few workers would broaden this term to include them (Mazarovich 1972).…”
Section: Classification Of Nonmarine-paralic Sedimentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sedimentological characteristics of molasse are distinctive (Beaudoin et al 1970), but such facies are not found exclusively in molasse sequences. Thus, clastic wedges in cratonic settings may be stratigraphicaliy and sedimentologically identical to molasse, and a few workers would broaden this term to include them (Mazarovich 1972).…”
Section: Classification Of Nonmarine-paralic Sedimentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). Incipient structures of this type are present in the molasse of southeast France (Beaudoin et al 1970), and a transverse structure, the Lochinvar Anticline, is present in the Permian coal measures of the Sydney Basin (Branagan 1976). Weimer (1970, Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms 'underfilled' and 'overfilled' (Allen, Crampton & Sinclair 1991) can be used qualitatively to describe the depositional state of a foreland basin. These terms are directly comparable with 'flysch' and 'molasse' which have been used to describe the stratigraphy of the Alpine Foreland Basin (Beaudoin, Gigot & Haccard 1970 ;Matter, Homewood et d. 1980;Homewood ct d..1986), and the Apennines (reviewed in Ricci-Lucchi 1986). Similar deep to shallow-water trends in depositional environments have been described from the Himalayan foredeep (Graham, Dickinson & Ingersoll 1975;Parkash, Sharma 8i Roy 1980), the South Pyrenean foredeep (Labaume, %wet & Seyve 1980), the Plio-Pleistocene foreland basin of western Taiwan (Covey 1986), the Cretaceous-Temary Colville Trough of northern Alaska (CoPkIey & Watts 199 I), and the Carboniferous Arkoma Basin ofSE USA (Houseknecht 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transgressive Aquitanian-Burdigalian Lower Marine Molasse Formation consists in tidal facies deposited in major subsiding environment that pass northward into siliciclastic deposits sourced from the inner Alps domain (Couëffe et al, 2004). The Langhian to Tortonian-lower Messinian succession is composed of marls, coarse-grained sandstones and limestones alternations of the Upper Marine Molasse Formation that pass laterally to prograding fluviodeltaic conglomerate sequences of the Valensole 1 Formation (Beaudouin et al, 1966(Beaudouin et al, , 1970Dubois and Curnelle 1978;Mercier, 1979;Aguilar and Clauzon, 1981;Haccard et al, 1989b;Clauzon et al, 1989;Besson, 2005;Cojan et al, 2013;Fig. 5b).…”
Section: Cenozoic Foreland Successions In Subalpine Zone: Barles Zone...mentioning
confidence: 99%