1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.3514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux penetration into flat superconductors of arbitrary shape: Patterns of magnetic and electric fields and current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative agreement is poor, though the shape of profiles (both across the indentation and away from it) is fairly well reproduced, in agreement with Ref. 8. The expected enhancement of E due to indentation is also obvious.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantitative agreement is poor, though the shape of profiles (both across the indentation and away from it) is fairly well reproduced, in agreement with Ref. 8. The expected enhancement of E due to indentation is also obvious.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…8 The physical mechanism behind this enhancement is however not yet understood. It could be related to the effect of thin-film geometry, to the flux creep or to thermal instabilities nucleated at the indentation.…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be understood from the fact that the magnitude of the electrical field is a key parameter deciding the onset of the thermomagnetic instability. 2 Since corners being concave with respect to the current flow pattern are indeed locations of largely enhanced electrical fields, 13 the superior stability of the circular hole is in full accordance with expectations.…”
Section: Applied Physics Letterssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The maximum electric field is very high, E > 50, compared to a plain strip where E < 1 at the edge, and it is also higher than for small indentations at a film edge. 38,39 The high E value reflects that all magnetic flux in the diamond-shaped region has passed through channels of width comparable to the antidot diameter. Numerically, the values E ≈ 50 and J ≈ 1.1 are consistent, since from Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%